LCRO 156/2016 KZ v XL on behalf of [Company A] (18 January 2019) [pdf, 320 KB]
...done”. [91] Mr YV submitted that the judgements made by Ms KZ, which underscored her advice to [Company A], were made in the heat of litigation, in good faith, and with an acceptable level of skill and care. He said that Ms KZ’s conduct had to be judged according to what confronted her at the time, and that the Committee had failed to do so, instead imposing its retrospective judgement. [92] He submitted that it would not have been competent conduct for Ms KZ to simply acquie...