Search Results

1. COVID-19 Response (Further Management Measures) Legislation Bill – Ministry of Justice [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...health practitioner, when exercising a power under the MH(CAT) Act that requires access to a person, where they consider it is not practicable for the person to be physically present (proposed new s 6A);  provide for the use of AVL by a Judge or a member of a Review Tribunal required to examine a person under the MH(CAT) Act, where they consider it is not practicable for the person to be physically present for the examination (proposed new s 6A);  provide...

2. [2017] NZSSAA 47 (27 September 2018) [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...$116.06 plus net rental of $214.39. This comes to a total of $330.45, less her accommodation costs of $150. That of course would be increased by $94.07 if the income abatement is cancelled with the exercise of the s 68 discretion. 15 [71] Judges in the High Court and Court of Appeal have inferred that the purpose of the Act is to alleviate hardship rather than eliminate it and that the efficient use of public funds should be balanced against supporting people who need he...

3. Fitikefu v Department of Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...cannot be exercised in a vacuum. [22] This is the point made by Elias CJ and Tipping J in Commerce Commission v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [2009] NZSC 120, [2010] 1 NZLR 379 at [3] per Elias CJ and at [39] per Tipping J. For the reasons given by both judges, the general rule is that limitation questions will not be decided in interlocutory proceedings in advance of the hearing except in the clearest of cases. WHETHER FACTS JUSTIFY STRIKING OUT PROCEEDINGS IN ADVANCE OF HEARING [23] In...

4. 2021-06-15 ORC - MOC - Submissions in response to Amicus Curiae memorandum [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...149T of the RMA BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant LEGAL SUBMISSIONS OF COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF THE OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL IN RELATION TO THE EXPIRY OF DEEMED PERMITS AND RIGHTS OF PRIORITY 15 June 2021 Judicial Officer: Judge Borthwick Applicant's Solicitor PO Box 4341 CHRISTCHURCH 8140 DX WX11179 Tel +64 3 379 7622 Fax +64 379 2467 Solicitor: P A C Maw / M A Mehlhopt (philip.maw@wynnwilliams.co.nz / michelle.mehlhopt@wynnwilliams.co.n...

5. Annexure 2 - Scope Challenges [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...solutions (in the form of methods) to accord with the resolution of issues raised by generic submissions. [21] Approached this way, the question about whether the submission is on or about the plan change will usually be a question of degree to be judged by the terms of the proposed change and of the content of the submissions.28 It is important to keep in mind that the court cannot permit the plan change to be appreciably changed without a real opportunity for participation by t...

6. SN & TN v B Ltd [2021] NZDT 1621 (17 December 2021) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than...

7. NM & B Ltd v J Ltd & RJ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1662 (9 August 2021) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Di...

8. CH v Q Ltd [2021] NZDT 1617 (9 August 2021) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than...

9. HM v B Ltd [2021] NZDT 1553 (3 August 2021) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than...

10. M Ltd v KC [2023] NZDT 26 (2 February 2023) [pdf, 145 KB]

    ...that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than...