National Standards Committee 2 v Mr Q [2023] NZLCDT 14 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]
...relationships at work have not been problematic. [33] Mr Morgan argues that, because our penalty response is not for punitive effect, there is no need for a period of suspension. It will serve no purpose, he argues. We disagree. The Tribunal and three judges of the High Court in Gardner-Hopkins, and more recently the Tribunal in Palmer, have determined suspension to be an appropriate disciplinary response to a law firm partner’s conduct of this nature towards his employees. [3...