16892 items matching your search terms
...Macfarlane, Bridget <Bridget.Macfarlane@justice.govt.nz> Sent: Friday, 24 May 2024 8:39 am To: Stewart, Ellen <Ellen.Stewart@justice.govt.nz> Subject: Te Kei o te Waka question Hello – question from Megan on the adoption section in the judge report: is it public that the project is paused? What do you think? Thanks, Bridget Bridget Macfarlane Acting Manager – Family Law Policy Group Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street | Wellington s...
...that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $260 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than...
...Person 2 DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL ON THE AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE CHARGE – (THE ‘INTERRUPTION OF MEETING’ CHARGE) – LCDT 010/10 Introduction [1] This charge was consolidated with charges LCDT 008/12 (‘the Judges charges’) by consent on 18 March 2014. The charges were heard together over 10 days, from 30 September to 9 October, and 10 December 2015. Further charges (‘the incompetence charges’ – LCDT 014/15) were heard by the same T...
...26-28 September 2011 and 1-3 February 2012 (Heard at Christchurch) Appearances: David Beck and David Goldwater, counsel for plaintiff Gillian Service and Anna Smith, counsel for defendant Judgment: 29 April 2013 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN A The plaintiff was not discriminated against unlawfully by the defendant in his employment and in his dismissal. B The plaintiff was dismissed unjustifiably by the defendant. C Following any appropriate training a...
...Defendant Hearing: 2, 3 and 4 November 2015 (Heard at Dunedin) Appearances: P Cranney and G Liu, counsel for plaintiff P Churchman QC and R Upton, counsel for defendant Judgment: 17 December 2015 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN INDEX Introduction ………………………………………………………………………… [1] The pleadings ………………………………………………………………………. [6]...
...similar design and configuration. [35] It is generally understood that the standards by which the conduct of a Council should be measured are set out in Askin v Knox10 where the Court concluded that a Council officer‟s conduct would be judged against the knowledge and practice at the time the negligent act or omission was said have to take place. It was reinforced by Stevens J in Hartley v Balemi.11 [36] In determining whether the Council has failed to meet the stand...
...work reasonably clearly identified. In Hamlin the house had minor defects since construction in 1972. It was not until 1989 that an engineer‟s report was commissioned which concluded the foundations were faulty and needed to be replaced. The Judge found that whilst cracks and minor defects had appeared over the years a reasonably prudent homeowner would not have suspected the foundations, or discovered the cause of the trouble until 1989. It was that decision that was ultima...
...discussion and support, facilitation os use and occupation of land CJ Williams, J Savage, J Milroy 07.03.2006 Hanford v Māori Trustee - Ohiro 19 & 21 Block 10 (Polhill Gully) 15 Whanganui Appellate Court MB 218-227, 2006 Chief Judges MB 24 15 WGAP 218-227, 2006 CJ 24 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act section 58, 17, 310, 312 Re order of exchange (land swapped for other land) CJ Williams, J Spencer, J Milroy, DCJ Isaac 16.02.2006 Phillips v Ashby - Oromahoe 17B2...
...BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 155 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under section 120 of the Act WILKINS FARMING CO LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-380) Appellant SOUTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commissioner M C G Mabin Environment Commissioner A P Gysberts Hearing: at lnvercargill on 10 February 2020 and at Christchurch on 16 and 17 July 2020 Appearances: B S Carruthers for the appellant P A C Ma...
...process. It involves a facilitated meeting (a conference) between the victim, offender, support people and other approved people, such as community representatives or interpreters. After the conference, the facilitator provides a report to the judge on the conference and any agreements made for the judge to consider during sentencing. Although restorative justice processes can operate in a variety of ways in the criminal justice system, the two most common in New Zealand are...