Search Results

1. B Ltd v NK & KX [2025] NZDT 28 (27 January 2025) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $260 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than...

2. [2024] NZLVT 063 - Bottinga v Auckland Council (16 December 2024) [pdf, 357 KB]

   ...TARAIPŪNARA WĀRIU WHENUA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Decision [2024] NZLVT 063 an appeal under s 36 of the Rating Valuations Act 1998 N BOTTINGA (ENV-2024-AKL-058) Objector AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Tribunal: Judge JA Smith (Chairperson) J Charters (Valuer Member) T Culav (Valuer Member) Hearing: 25 October 2024 Last case event: Appearances: N Bottinga for herself J Atkin and K Wakelin for Auckland Council Date of Decision: 16 Dece...

3. Frequently asked questions

   ...To find out if you have any reactivated warnings, you can write to your local court. In your request you must state you want to know how many reactivated warnings you have and that you would like a copy of your Criminal and Traffic History report. A judge will then decide about giving you a copy of the report. This information cannot be obtained by applying for a criminal record check. If you are currently appearing before the court, please talk to your lawyer and they can find out if you have...

   Located in:

   1. Criminal record check

4. ZM v BQ [2025] NZDT 85 (27 February 2025) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $260 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Dis...

5. U Ltd v M Ltd [2025] NZDT 63 (13 February 2025) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $260 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than...

6. WN v ZM & Ors [2025] NZDT 128 (26 February 2025) [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $260 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than...

7. Auckland Standards Committee v ABC [2012] NZLCDT 14 [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...[38] The practitioner was granted interim name suppression until 13 June 2012 (the date set down for the penalty hearing) by the Tribunal, on 3 May 2012 after a hearing on the papers.1 In that determination on interim name suppression the Chair, Judge D F Clarkson, noted the presumption of openness in disciplinary proceedings required by the public interest, and the need to balance that against the private interests of practitioners seeking suppression. [39] Her Honour also note...

8. Otago Standards Committee v Rayner [2014] NZLCDT 62 [pdf, 87 KB]

   BEFORE THE NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZLCDT 62 LCDT 005/14 BETWEEN STANDARDS COMMITTEE OF THE OTAGO BRANCH OF THE NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY Applicant AND NOEL RAYNER Respondent CHAIR Judge BJ Kendall (retired) MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr M Gough Ms S Hughes QC Mr W Smith Mr S Walker HEARING at Dunedin DATE 19 August 2014 COUNSEL Mr G Nation for the Standards Committee Mr L Andersen for the Practitioner...

9. Mason v New Zealand Law Society [2015] NZLCDT 11 [pdf, 83 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZLCDT 11 LCDT 034/14 BETWEEN JANET MASON Appellant AND THE NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY Respondent CHAIR Judge BJ Kendall (retired) MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr W Chapman Ms S Gill Mr A Marshall Mr S Morris HEARING at Wellington Tribunals DATE 6 March 2015 DATE OF DECISION 22 April 2015 COUNSEL Mr P McBride for the Appellant Mr K Johnston for the Respondent 2 RESERVE...

10. Regulatory Impact Statement Review of aspects of the bail system [pdf, 268 KB]

    ...Police from arresting a child or young person without a warrant if they have reasonable cause to suspect that the child or young person has committed a purely indictable offence, and that the arrest is required in the public interest. 55. Youth Court Judges have the ability to issue an arrest warrant for a child or young person for any breach of a bail condition under section 36 of the Bail Act. However, this power is used sparingly. PROBLEM 56. Arrest without a warrant will usually...