Search Results

1. Collective impact toolbox [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...events – barbecues, fairs, sports events, etc · joint posters and messages for every staff interaction · meeting with particular vulnerable individuals or families · visiting businesses · information sessions for partner organisations e.g. judges, lawyers, NGOs, schools · enforcement operations – holding checkpoints, clearing warrants to arrest. A C TI V IT IE S This is an opportunity to do something different, so think outside the box. St ep 4 Pick three to four d...

2. Andrews v Commissioner of Police [2013] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...[11] Mr Andrews was charged with a number of burglary offences. Those charges were laid indictably. Ms Edmonds was charged with receiving property from Mr Andrews. Those charges were also laid indictably. According to the sentencing notes of Judge AJ Adeane in the District Court at Napier (R v Andrews DC Napier CRI-2009-020-3923, 24 June 2011) both Mr Andrews and Ms Edmonds were first summonsed to appear on 8 September 2009. [12] While Ms Edmonds was released on bail, Mr Andrews w...

3. NZLS v Gilbert [2012] NZLCDT 24 [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...Tribunal. [5] The division of the Tribunal involved in the abandoned hearing has recused itself from dealing with this application. The basis for that recusal was set out in a Minute dated 2 April 2012 issued by the Chair of that division, Judge D F Clarkson. [6] This division of the Tribunal convened to hear the Application for Stay in Wellington on 23 and 24 May 2012. At the conclusion of the hearing the Tribunal reserved its decision. The Charges [7] The seven miscon...

4. 2010 to 2013 Ministry of Justice statement of intent [pdf, 498 KB]

   ...Ministry recognises the importance of the constitutional independence of judicial decision making, and works with the judiciary to ensure this independence is preserved and maintained. Some staff exercise judicial functions under the supervision of judges (for example, exercising Registrars’ powers in relation to interlocutory applications). However, the same staff, as part of their responsibilities as Ministry employees, may also perform tasks related to the functions of the exe...

5. Tomov v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 34 [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...house is a large one and the defects in construction are extensive and widespread. The house had a market value in 2006 of $810,000. The figures at issue are of course estimates only and in resolving this issue there is an inevitable degree of judgement involved rather than any exact science. [42] I was impressed with the particular care that Mr White took to identify as precisely as possible what the actual costs might be. I accept his figure of $446,713.10. That figure...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 027 Kumeu Property Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 17 MB]

   ...Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 27 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN KUMEU PROPERTY LIMITED (ENV-2017-AKL-44) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge JA Smith Environment Commissioner SK Prime Hearing: Auckland, 12-16 February 2018, site visit 21 February Appearances: RE Bartlett QC for Kumeu Property Limited (the Applicant) DK Hartley and MR Matich for Auckland Council (the Council...

7. McDonald v Accident Compensation Corporation [2015] NZACA 14 [pdf, 207 KB]

   ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND [2015] NZACA 14 ACA 12/2008 Bryce Malcolm McDonald Appellant Accident Compensation Corporation Respondent Before: D J Plunkett Counsel for the Appellant: J Miller Counsel for the Respondent: P McBride Date of Hearing: 6 October 2015 Date of Decision: 16 December 2015 __________________________________________________________________ DECISION _______________________________

8. Lee v Auckland Council [2016] NZWHT Auckland 2 [pdf, 317 KB]

   ...$40,000. [79] The resolution of the dispute between the valuation experts is important. This is because there is no prima facie rule as to whether diminution of value or the remedial cost is the most appropriate measure of loss. Each case must be judged on its own mixture of facts as they affect the Lees and other parties. The Tribunal should also select the measure of damages which is best calculated to fairly compensate the Lees for the harm done while at the same time being...

9. [2018] NZEnvC 084 Director General of Conservation and Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of NZ v Invercargill City Council [pdf, 6.2 MB]

   ...(ENV-2016-CHC-91 ) POWERNET LIMITED (ENV-2016-CHC-92) ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2016-CHC-99) TRANS POWER NZ LIMITED (ENV-2016-CHC-100) Appellants INVERCARGILL CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J R Jackson (Sitting alone under section 279(1) of the Act) Hearing: at Invercargill on 19 March 2018 Appearances: P Williams for Director-General of Conservation P E Anderson for Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New...

10. BORA Policing Bill [pdf, 415 KB]

    ...the benefits of the objectives must outweigh the deleterious effects of temporarily circumscribing a person's right to use a public or private road. 65. There are, however, numerous instances where the state circumscribes the use of roads. Judge Ryan in Kerr v Attorney-General noted that: "It must be observed that if s 18 is concerned with freedom to use the roads then it must be one of the most qualified of the rights and freedoms affirmed by the Act for it is subject to the...