Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 135 Te Whakakitenga o Waikato Incorporated v Waikato District Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...OF an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN TE WHAKAKITENGA O WAIKATO INCORPORATED (ENV-2022-AKL-00033) Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge S M Tepania sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case event: 19 May 2023 Date of Order: 3 July 2023 Date of Issue: 3 July 2023 _________________________________________________________________ CONSENT ORDER _____________...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 127 100WPS Trustee Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 18 MB]

   ...Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN 100WPS TRUSTEE LIMITED (ENV-2023-CHC-37) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent Order: 30 May 2024 _______________________________________________________________ CONSENT ORDER __________________________________...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 282 M & L Taylor Partnership v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 7.4 MB]

   ...No. [2024] NZEnvC 282 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN M & L TAYLOR PARTNERSHIP (ENV-2023-CHC-43) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge P A Steven – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent Determination: 11 November 2024 _______________________________________________________________ CONSENT DETERMINATION __________________...

4. Evaluation of Family Safety Teams pilot: stage 1 [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...identified high risk victims and offenders. • Identify additional resources needed for effective operation and look at ways resources can be provided. • Raise awareness of statutory agencies involved in family violence operations, especially judges. • Lobby for a Family Violence Court in the Wairarapa. • Organise family violence training on procedures for crises core services with Police and CYFS frontline staff, supervisors, prosecutions where deficiencies are identified....

5. [2013] NZEmpC 172 Aviation & Marine Engineers Assn Inc v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 601 KB]

   ...March 2013 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Jim Roberts and Jodi Clark, counsel for plaintiffs Andrew Caisley, counsel for defendant Interim Judgment 4 June 2013 Final Judgment: 13 September 2013 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN A Line maintenance work of aircraft engineers (as defined at [1]-[4] of the interim judgment) 1 is not covered by the Blue or Green Books collective agreements. B Collective agreement cove...

6. [2022] NZEnvC 114 Mangawhai Harbour Restoration Society Inc v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...without imposing a burden of proof on any party; and (d) a policy, rule or method can be considered against the purpose found in the objectives and undisputed policies in the plan. Where the objectives and policies are challenged, these need to be judged against superior documents including any relevant regional plans, policy statements and national standards. Regard should be had to the policies and objectives of the plan through the consideration of Part 2 of the RMA where th...

7. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - summary record 3rd report (continued) [pdf, 40 KB]

   ..."other status" was too vague. The situation must be viewed in the context of the public’s attitude towards the Bill of Rights, which he had outlined earlier. 7. Turning to the questions put by Mr. Prado Vallejo, he said that the fact that judges could not strike down legislation which ran counter to the Covenant did not constitute a weakness in terms of article 2 of the Covenant. New Zealand, like other common law countries, did not interpret article 2 of the Covenant as requiring...

8. Rafiq v Commissioner of Police [2012] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...Rafiq is that he believes that having instituted the several proceedings, it is now for each defendant to satisfy him (Mr Rafiq) that they are innocent of each and every alleged impropriety (of which there are many) and that Mr Rafiq is to be the sole judge of their “innocence”. The additional cost and inconvenience (to the defendants) of a hearing in Auckland appears to be part of a strategy to “punish” the various departments for their alleged transgressions against Mr Rafiq....

9. Parohinog v Yellow Pages Group Ltd (Strike-Out Application No 2) [2015] NZHRRT 14 [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...relation to Diwa Feck’s complaint about me? No ordinary people can afford to pay people stalking and harassing me, whether I am at home, on the road, the telephone, the internet and even when I am asleep. I know that the Auckland Family Court Judge made an Order for COCA 2004, S77 to be placed since 2005, but I don’t need to be followed around and GANGSTALKED and HARASSED. … 26. IPCA (INDEPENDENT POLICE CONDUCT AUTHORITY) – please refer letter dated 11th March 2015 which...

10. Langdon v ACC [2014] NZACA 9 [pdf, 71 KB]

    ...general administrative review of the appeals when Mr Langdon had legal representation, some appeals were withdrawn, some were adjourned sine die, and the three appeals relating to the 2005/2006 relevant earnings decisions were transferred by His Honour Judge Cadenhead to the Authority to determine, and were then amalgamated under ACA 08/08. [8] The appeal languished for a number of years when Mr Langdon was in Australia, but was resurrected through a series of directions conferences i...