16832 items matching your search terms
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000021 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 21 BETWEEN SHARON and DAVID WALL Claimants AND JANE ALISON MALONE AND ESTATE OF STEPHEN DAVID MALONE First Respondents AND NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND JOHN FINLAY (Removed) Third Respondent AND WILLIAM CARL BRAHNE (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND PHILLIP NEVILLE WARREN (Removed) Fifth Respondent Hearing: 25, 26 and 30 March 2010 Final Written sub
...said they were surprised at how holistic yet fair their plans were, and how their circumstances were considered. Specifically, they said they were satisfied with: being heard being able to speak without interruption not feeling judged the directness and clarity of the process feeling welcomed by the pō hiri having food and a warm drink mixing with panellists before the panel the process being explained to them before it started. Trai...
...page 21 of 34 10.2 It is submitted that the standard of care required of a builder in performing his services is the care reasonably to be expected of skilled and informed members of his trade or profession judged at the time the work was done. I accept that this is a fair generalisation of the required standard. 10.3 As I have already mentioned, Cally took little part in these proceedings. I am satisfied that the company was properly served
[2012] NZACA 4 (ACA 004/09) IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN TANIELA TANGI of Auckland Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford HEARING at Auckland on 9 December 2011 APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Mr H
...requirement R6307 included in the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan subject to the further modifications shown in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2. 8. Panel reasons The reasons for the Panel's recommendation are set out in section 9 below. Panel Chair Judge David Kirkpatrick Chair's Signature cite,. I .. (-f-. -_ .. _--_ .. Date 22 July 2016 6 IHP Report to AC Topic 074 KiwiRail6300-6305 R6307 2016-07-22 9. Assessment of modifications and submissions Requiring author...
1 Planning – Expert Witness Statement Case: ENV-2016-CHC-047 BETWEEN: Blueskin Energy Limited v Dunedin City Council Topic: Planning Undertaken: 22-26 May 2017 (via phone and email correspondence) Environment Court Practice Note: In preparing this joint witness statement, we have each: • Read the Environment Court Consolidated Practice Note 2014 Code of Conduct and agree to abide by it. • Read and abided by the Environment Court Consolidated
...payable. [62] There was, he submitted, no conflict of interest. Unit M 4 At the hearing of his application for review, Mr WS submitted that his claim against the guarantors failed because the Judge held that the transaction to purchase Unit M was not an arm’s length transaction. However, Mr WS did not produce a copy of that judgment at the hearing. He was asked to provide it after the hearing, but has not done so. 9 [63] In...
...Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act HOKIO TRUSTS (ENV-20 16-WLG-000004) Appellant MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Court: Heard: Environment Judge B P Dwyer sitting alone under s 279 of the Act In Chambers at Wellington Date of Decision: 27 September 2017 Date of Issue: 27 September 2017 COSTS DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: Costs awarded Introduction 2 REASONS...
...transaction. Failure to follow Bartle [51] Mr Napier says that Bartle is the definitive case on solicitors’ duties in New Zealand. I do not accept that submission. Bartle, which is a decision of the High Court, albeit of the then Chief High Court Judge, has to be seen in the continuum of decisions, including the Privy Council decision in Clark Boyce and the Court of Appeal’s decision in Gilbert v Shanahan22 which also considered the scope of solicitors’ duties in New Zeala...
Impact Statement Template | 1 Coversheet: Additional policy approvals for the Privacy Bill Advising agencies The Ministry of Justice Decision sought Agreement to progress changes to the Privacy Bill to: 1. amend the threshold for mandatory notification of a privacy breach, so that agencies must notify breaches where the breach is likely to cause serious harm 2. clarify the Bill’s application to agencies based overseas and information held overseas 3. expand the def