16849 items matching your search terms
FILE NO: 0092 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN: DAVID JOHN WIDDOWSON & ANGELA PHYLLIS WIDDOWSON Claimant AND: PETER FRANCES BEKX First Respondent AND: DEBBIE ANNE BEKX Second Respondent AND: WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL Third Respondent AND IAN M STUART Fourth Respondent (REMOVED) AND STUDORP LTD Fifth Respondent DETERMINATION OF ADJUDICATORS
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000023 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 19 BETWEEN OVERVIEW TRUSTEE LIMITED AS TRUSTEE OF THE CARRIGAFOYLE TRUST Claimant AND GILBERT EDMOND ANTON COOK AND MARK SIMON HORNABROOK AS TRUSTEES OF THE C C TRUST (Removed) First Respondent AND GILBERT EDMOND ANTON COOK (Removed) Second Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Third Respondent AND FEARON HAY ARCHITECTS LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WINDOW
[2017] NZSSAA 020 Reference No. SSA 147/13 and SSA 055/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY This decision is subject to an order directing that the location where the hearing took place, the names of witnesses, counsel, and the parties and where they live are not to be published, as that informati
...No. [2017] NZEnvC 200 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for a declaration pursuant to s 311 (1) of the Act MORNINGSTAR DEVELOPMENT LIMITED (ENV-2017-AKL-152) Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge JA Smith Environment Commissioner ACE Leijnen Hearing: At Auckland on 12 December 2017 Appearances: CDH Malone for Morningstar Development Limited (Morningstar) AJ Cumming for Auckland Council (the Council) Date of Decision: 12 Dece...
E.64 SOI (2015) Statement of intent 2015–2019 Ministry of Justice DRAFT 2 DRAFT 3 Contents Introduction from the Minister of Justice .................................................................................................. 4 Introduction from the Chief Executive ...................................................................................................... 6 Our story...............................................................
...TRUSTS (ENV-2016-AKL -242) HOUSING CORPORATION OF NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2016-AKL -236) RYMAN HEAL THCARE LIMITED AND RETIREMENT VILLAGES ASSOCIATION OF NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2016-AKL -230) Appellants AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge JA Smith Environment Commissioner ACE Leijnen Environment Commissioner SK Prime At Auckland on 22 and 23 January 2018 MJL Dickey and RS Ward for Auckland Council CE Kirman and A Devine for Housing Corporation of New Zealand (Housing C...
...TRUSTS (ENV-2016-AKL -242) HOUSING CORPORATION OF NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2016-AKL -236) RYMAN HEAL THCARE LIMITED AND RETIREMENT VILLAGES ASSOCIATION OF NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2016-AKL -230) Appellants AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge JA Smith Environment Commissioner ACE Leijnen Environment Commissioner SK Prime At Auckland on 22 and 23 January 2018 MJL Dickey and RS Ward for Auckland Council CE Kirman and A Devine for Housing Corporation of New Zealand (Housing C...
...MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvCI ~ t.. of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 121 of the Act THE RISE LIMITED (ENV-2017 -AKL-055) Appellant KAIPARA DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge JA Smith, sitting alone pursuant to s 279 of the Act At Auckland on 31 October 2017 JC Brabant for The Rise Limited (the Rise) A Green and RS Ward for Kaipara District Council (the Council) 2 November 2017 ORAL DECISION OF THE EN...
...that issue of complaint. 12 Unsatisfactory conduct? [51] The Committee next turned consider whether Mr EL’s conduct amounted to unsatisfactory conduct under s 12 of the Act. It referred to a decision of the District Court, in which the judge held:9 In summary, the test for whether a disciplinary [finding] is merited is a two-stage test based on first, an objective assessment of whether the practitioner departed from acceptable professional standards and secondly, whether th...
...where the bill had already been subject to revision. Section 151 of the 1982 Act provided that the Court shall not make an order for the reference of a bill for revision except in special circumstances. [40] The Court of Appeal rejected the trial Judge’s finding that a serious risk of injustice was required. Although the three members of the Court produced three different tests, the tests advanced provide useful guidance in considering the meaning of ‘special circumstances’....