Search Results

1. [2016] NZEmpC 178 Borsboom (Labour Inspector) v Preet PVT Ltd [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...AND WARRINGTON DISCOUNT TOBACCO LIMITED Second Respondent AND PALLAVI KAUR BAL (AKA TINA BAL) Third Respondent Hearing: On papers filed on 20 December 2016 Judgment: 21 December 2016 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] On 16 December 2016 the Court made freezing orders in this proceeding on the ‘without notice’ application for these made by the Labour Inspector. 1 Judge Corkill’s orders were then to be served and a ‘return date...

2. [2016] NZEmpC 114 Hutt City Veterinary Care Ltd v Barr [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...Defendant Hearing: (by liquidators' memorandum filed on 26 August 2016) Representation: K Francis, counsel for the liquidator G Ogilvie, advocate for the defendant Judgment: 2 September 2016 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE K G SMITH [1] The plaintiff was placed in liquidation on 26 July 2016. [2] On 23 June 2016, Chief Judge Colgan issued a minute to the plaintiff containing directions about the proceeding. The plaintiff was informed that its statem...

3. Covid-19 Level 4 Alert protocol [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...Alert Levels drop, which could be some weeks. This will all be subject to further direction from time to time, as this unprecedented situation continues to change. As head of this Court, I will arrange prioritisation of cases over which Environment Judges are presiding. Those that are the most urgent involving important issues in the public interest, could be the subject of some remote activity by Judges and Commissioners. Much of such activity will be audio, as AVL facilities are being...

4. [2020] NZEmpC 36 Carrigan v Attorney-General [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...On the papers Appearances: First plaintiff in person P Dale QC, counsel for second plaintiff S McKechnie and T Bremner, counsel for defendants Judgment: 25 March 2020 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 2) OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS (Application for leave to appear and be heard as intervenor) [1] In my judgment of 17 March 2020, I granted leave to the Human Rights Commission (the Commission) to apply to intervene and be heard in the proceedings.1...

5. Youth Court overview

   ...Plan. This might include paying for damage, doing community work, writing an apology letter and/or attending counselling. When a young person commits a serious offence, they may be directed to a Youth Court to come before a Youth Court Judge. Youth Courts deal with all serious offending committed by a young person other than murder and manslaughter. Murder and manslaughter cases will begin in the Youth Court, before being transferred to the High Court. The Youth Court does not de...

   Located in:

   1. Youth Court >
   2. About Youth Court

6. [2009] NZEmpC AC 2/09 Lewis v Howick College Board of Trustees [pdf, 25 KB]

   ...HOWICK COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES Defendant Hearing: 5 February 2009 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Raymond Clendon Lewis, plaintiff Richard Harrison, counsel for defendant Judgment: 9 February 2009 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] The defendant Board has objected to disclose all of the items listed in the plaintiff’s notice requiring disclosure, with the exception of Board minutes which dealt with an investigation into the complaint which...

7. Legal-Services-Waikato-AODT-Court.pdf [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...have a maximum capacity of 50 participants at any one time. AODT Court sittings will be once a week, split into two sessions: the pre-court meeting and the open court session. AODT Court participants are not present at the pre-court meeting. The Judge and AODT Court team discuss a participant’s progress, any challenges and treatment. The AODT Court team includes the Court Coordinator, Health Case Manager, Defence Lawyer, Police Prosecutor, Pou Oranga (wellness and Māori cultu...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 161 Tranzurban Hutt Valley Ltd v NZ Tramways & Public Passenger Transport Employees Union Wellington Inc [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...PASSENGER TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES UNION WELLINGTON INC Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: D Vincent, counsel for plaintiff P Cranney, counsel for defendant Judgment: 31 August 2022 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] A substantive judgment in this proceeding resolved a challenge in favour of the plaintiff.1 [2] At issue was the correct application of provisions in the Employment Relations Act 2000 as to rest an...

9. Protection Order Applications flow chart December 2023 [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...months of the year (which would include applications given an additional 3 months to allow the respondent to be served). The final outcomes included: Application granted - a final Protection Order is granted. Dismissed or struck out by court - a judge has considered the application and decided there are insufficient grounds for a Protection Order to be granted. Lapsed - if the respondent can’t be served with the temporary Protection Order it can be extended for an additional 3 month...

10. Protection-Order-applications-flowchart_JUN2023_v1.0.pdf [pdf, 184 KB]

    ...months of the year (which would include applications given an additional 3 months to allow the respondent to be served). The final outcomes included: Application granted - a final Protection Order is granted. Dismissed or struck out by court - a judge has considered the application and decided there are insufficient grounds for a Protection Order to be granted. Lapsed - if the respondent can’t be served with the temporary Protection Order it can be extended for an additional 3 month...