IR v ST LCRO 203 / 2010 (9 March 2012) [pdf, 190 KB]
...properties that each of them had brought into the marriage were roughly equal after the effect of inflation was taken into account, and that therefore relationship property should be divided equally. 2 [4] In the first Family Court judgment, Judge Strettell determined that there should be unequal sharing in the proportion of 65% (Ms IS) and 35% (Mr IR). [5] Mr IR appealed that judgment to the High Court, initially acting on his own behalf. Part way through proceedings howeve...