Search Results

Search results for judges.

16639 items matching your search terms

  1. Smith v The Proprietors of Mangaroa and other blocks (2015) 113 Waiariki MB 1 (113 WAR 1) [pdf, 209 KB]

    ...Rotorua) 19 December 2014 (110 Waiariki MB 157-170) (Heard at Rotorua) Appearances: Mr C M Bidois, counsel for the Applicants Mr M Beech, counsel for the Respondents Judgment: 9 February 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S R CLARK AS TO COSTS Copies to: Mr C M Bidois, East Brewster, Solicitors, P O Box 172, Rotorua, curtis.bidois@eastbrewster.co.nz Mr M Beech, Holland Beckett, Private Bag 12011, Tauranga 3143, mark.beech@hob...

  2. [2014] NZEmpC 212 Cudby & Meade Ltd v New Zealand Furniture, Manufacturing and Associated Workers’ Union Inc [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...(on the papers - Court minutes dated 7 April, 11 September and 21 October 2014) Appearances: H Memelink, representative for the applicant G Clarke, advocate for the resondents Judgment: 14 November 2014 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD Background [1] The Court has before it an application by Cudby and Meade Limited (Cudby & Meade) for leave to challenge out of time a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) dated 18 March 2...

  3. Kopa v Cooper - Motatau 2 Section 23A1A Block [2010] 2010 Māori Appellate Court MB 243 (2010 APPEAL 243) [pdf, 106 KB]

    ...APPEAL 243) APPEAL 2009/21 A20090009605 UNDER Sections 58 and 59, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Motatau 2 Section 23A1A Block BETWEEN SONNY APOTORO KOPA Appellant AND ROB COOPER AND OTHERS Respondents Coram: Judge CL Fox (Presiding) Judge S Te A Milroy Judge CT Coxhead Appearances: Mr Kopa, for himself Mr R Bowden, Counsel for the respondents Hearing: 10 February 2010 (Heard at Whangarei) Judgment: 16 August 2010 RESERVE...

  4. JK v Molloy LCRO 155/2013 (14 April 2016) [pdf, 151 KB]

    ...articles Mr JK provided, the 22 May 2011 Sunday Star Times article, was a report of a report. [137] In the evidence he provided to the Committee, and on review Mr Molloy has pointed to views expressed by others, a member of the public, colleagues, judges and academics as providing an objective foundation for the views he expresses in his 44 Orlov v New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal [2014] NZHC 1987, [2015] 2...

  5. BORA Search and Surveillance Powers Bill [pdf, 314 KB]

    ...information-gathering powers and procedures, along with conditions on their exercise: 4.1 Warrantless search of persons, places and things in a range of contexts (cll 7-11, 14-21, 24-28, 81, 83-86, 117-118); 4.2 Search under warrant issued by a judge or other independent issuing officer (cl 96-108); 4.3 The making of orders to produce certain information by way of interview under an "examination order" issued by a judge (cll 33-42) or in response to a specific "product...

  6. Frequently asked questions Victims trust and confidence in the criminal justice system [pdf, 217 KB]

    ...entity? It varies. One of the questions respondents were asked was about their confidence that the CJS as a whole is effective. Other questions ask about six important components of the CJS: groups that provide services for victims, the Police, judges, juries, criminal lawyers, and the Parole Board. Respondents were also asked about their views of the prison service and probation officers. However, these results were not analysed for this report because the focus was on parts of...

  7. Online Final PO Information at Service Pack Applicant [pdf, 448 KB]

    ...these rules are broken or you feel unsafe The Order sets out rules that Respondent has to follow. Please read this information to help you use this Order. As a Final Order, these rules will be in place forever or until they are removed by a Judge. If other people know, you don’t have to be the only person looking after your safety. Tell them to call the Police if a rule is broken. You can consent to contact ➢ If you want the Respondent to have contact with you or live wi...

  8. Online Final PO Information at Service Pack Respondent [pdf, 461 KB]

    ...What does this mean for you Hello Respondent • You have received a Final Protection Order. • This Order lists what you cannot do and things you must do. • This is a Final Protection Order. This means these rules last forever or until a Judge removes them. • You should read the other documents as there may be other rules not included here. • You need to know what this Order means for you. You might feel angry but even if you don’t agree with what has been said you need t...

  9. Priest - Ngati Rahiri 1A, 3E, 4, 4Y, 6C, 6G and 7C Maori Reservation (2020) 414 Aotea MB 33 (414 AOT 33) [pdf, 252 KB]

    ...Te kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 18 October 2019, 408 Aotea MB 164-173 13 February 2020, 413 Aotea MB 84-91 (Heard at New Plymouth) Whakataunga: Judgment date 17 March 2020 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ JUDGE D H STONE Judgment of Judge D H Stone 414 Aotea MB 34 Hei tīmatanga kōrero - Introduction [1] The Ngāti Rāhiri 1A, 3E, 4, 4Y, 6C, 6G and 7C Māori reservation blocks are located in Motunui, Taranaki. As the name s...

  10. [2023] NZEmpC 199 Breen v Prime Resources Company Ltd [pdf, 209 KB]

    ...KEVIN BREEN Defendant Hearing: 13 June and 26 September 2023 Appearances: S Houliston, counsel for Kevin Breen A Schirnack, counsel for Prime Resources Company Limited Judgment: 15 November 2023 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS Introduction [1] Mr Breen was employed by Prime Resources Company Ltd (the company) in April 2021. His job was directed at selling off-the-plans apartments for the company. Less than four months after Mr...