2844 items matching your search terms
...EDWARD MATCHITT Applicant A20130008237 UNDER IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN Section 289, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 Te Kaha 65 Block PARATENE MATCHITT Applicant Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 27 June 2019 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD Copies to: J Koning, P O Box 5, Te Puke 3153 215 Waiariki MB 205 Tēnā tātou i ō tātou aituā maha e ngapu nei te whe...
...JONAS Plaintiff AND MENEFY TRUCKING LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 3 and 4 September 2013 (heard at Wellington) Appearances: Caroline Rieger, counsel for the plaintiff Ray Parmenter, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 14 November 2013 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD Introduction [1] The plaintiff, Mr Darren Jonas, is a truck driver by occupation. He had spent approximately twenty years in the industry before taking up employment with...
...view on the evidence before her. Nevertheless, as the Guidelines properly recognise, where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. [28] More recently, the High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:5 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determ...
...well-established requirement that they seek signatures of all registered owners, or express written authority that someone else can sign. [36] She referred to the decisions of Complaints Assessment Committees in Ledger,16 and Beaufill,17 and the judgment of his Honour Justice Lang in Robinson v Real Estate Agents Authority allowing an appeal from a decision of the Tribunal upholding a 14 As recorded in fn 5, above, the Committee noted in its penalty decision that the evidence...
...AND MARSHA TE RONGOMAU Respondent Hearing: 14 February 2012 (Heard at Hamilton) Court: Judge A D Spencer Judge D J Ambler Judge S F Reeves Counsel: Charl Hirschfeld, for the Appellant Rachel Hall, for the Respondent Judgment: 1 June 2012 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT Copies to: Charl Hirschfeld, Harbour View Law, PO Box 7728, Auckland 1141 Rachel Hall, McCaw Lewis Lawyers, PO Box 9348, Hamilton 3240 2012 Māori Appellate...
...March 2021 Further submissions filed on 26 July, 2 and 9 August 2021 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: P Cranney, counsel for plaintiff No appearance for first defendant S Hornsby-Geluk and M Vant, counsel for second defendant Judgment: 4 July 2022 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE KATHRYN BECK [1] This challenge relates to a dispute about the interpretation and application of cl 5.4 of the Secondary Teachers’ Collective Agreement 2019–2022 (the 2019 STCA). [2] Cl...
...Section 239, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Horowhenua Block 11 (Lake Horowhenua) BETWEEN THE TRUSTEES OF LAKE HOROWHENUA TRUST Applicants Hearing: 278 Aotea MB 24, dated 16 January 2012 (Heard at Levin) Judgment: 22 June 2012 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Introduction [1] On 23 July 2009 and 25 September 2009 all but one of the current trustees of Lake Horowhenua Trust were appointed to their present roles. 1 At the time of the...
...BETWEEN STL LINEHAUL LTD Plaintiff AND LEO WATERS Defendant Hearing: 2 and 3 June 2022 (Heard at Auckland, via AVL) Appearances: Q Haines, advocate for plaintiff L Anderson, advocate for defendant Judgment: 28 June 2022 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN [1] Mr Waters was dismissed for redundancy by STL Linehaul Ltd (STL) by letter dated 21 October 2019. The Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) found that dismi...
...AN APPLICATION TO RECALL DECISION BETWEEN CRAIG RICHARD JONES Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the Papers Appearances: Applicant in person D Tuiqereqere for the respondent Judgment: 11 August 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT OF JUDGE AA SINCLAIR [On Application for Recall of Decision by Accident Compensation Appeal Authority] _________________________...
...balustrade, and that this work has been constructed entirely in accordance with the drawings, notwithstanding the various location references to technical literature. [78] In my view Mr Summers‟ approach is at variance with the High Court‟s judgment, which has been confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Sunset Terraces. Heath J held that designers are entitled to assume that a reasonable builder would have access to and rely on the manufacturers‟ specifications, and tha...