2885 items matching your search terms
...AND MIDWIFERY EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATION AND ADVISORY SERVICE INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: 4 November 2024 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: L Acland, counsel for plaintiff S Mitchell KC, counsel for defendant Judgment: 24 January 2025 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 2) OF JUDGE B A CORKILL (Determination of a preliminary legal issue) Introduction [1] In my first interlocutory judgment, I approved a preliminary legal issue which concern...
...The Court’s power to amend decision Section 278 of the RMA provides that Environment Judges have the same powers that the District Court has in the exercise of its jurisdiction. Rule 11.10 of the District Court Rules 2014 specifies that a judgement may be corrected by the court if it contains a clerical mistake or an error arising from an accidental slip or omission. Consideration The parties have asked for these clarifications and the Court is satisfied that they clarif...
...2010 (Heard at Christchurch) Appearances: C H Toogood QC and R S Brown, counsel for plaintiff Jane Costigan, counsel for the first defendant A Shakespeare, counsel for second defendant P Shamy and K Dalziel, counsel for the third defendant Judgment: 17 May 2010 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] The plaintiff has sought leave to amend its pleadings as to the quantum of damages it is seeking against the defendants. The amendment consists of deleting...
...Hearing: On papers filed on 21, 28 November and 5, 11, 12, 14 and 21 December 2017 Appearances: T Drake, counsel for applicant G Service, counsel for first, second and third respondents D Jhinku, counsel for fourth respondent Judgment: 13 February 2018 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS Introduction [1] On 3 October 2017 the applicant (Ms Kazemi) filed a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority declining to remove a...
2013 Chief Judge's MB 119 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAITKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT Hearing: Appearances: Judgment: Solicitors: AlOOS0016575 CJ2009/S UNDER Section 45 ofTe Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Hauturu East 7,12,13,14 and Section 44 Block X Orahiri Survey District BETWEEN NORMAN TANE Applicant AND TANETINORAU OPATAIA WHANAU TRUST and TANETINORAU OPATAIA WHANAU AHU WHENUA TRUST Respondents 17 June 2011, 2011 ChiefJudge's MB 17...
...civil disputes • allowing courts and tribunals to adopt modern practices, such as digital documents and electronic case files. • increasing the transparency of courts (for example, judges will be required to publish information about reserved judgments) • new measures to deal with meritless proceedings by giving judges more options to limit or prevent people from initiating vexatious civil cases. STREAMLINING OUR SERVICES We completed the centralisation of High Court case ma...
...seemed to be putting it that we had misunderstood his submission and stated: 6.5 Whether or not there was disclosure of his intentions to create the three additional covenants was an issue which was squarely before the High Court. Hansen J in his judgment said as follows: [17] “The Harlows accept that the proposal to register a covenant prohibiting shooting was discussed before they signed the agreement. They also acknowledge that in the course of the discussion the issue of noisy...
...Ellis J determined an application by Fletcher for an order that the claimant pay increased security for costs in its appeal against our decision.1 In that decision Her Honour drew conclusions relevant to the question of costs and referred to the judgment of Woodhouse J in another matter involving West Harbour Holdings Limited and Brent Ivil, the settlor of the Livi Trust, West Harbour Holdings Limited v Waipareira Investments Limited.2 [8] Waipareira is an action brought by We...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2020-100-001 [2022] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 BETWEEN ROSEMARY ALICE ALCHIN and SIMON FRANCIS SCOTT Claimants AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Hearing: 6 and 7 May 2021 and 21 October 2021 Closing submissions: Claimants 11 November 2021 Respondents 25 November 2021 Claimants reply 2 December 2021 Appearances: Scott McKenna and Amin Osama for the claimants Paul Robertson and John Tian for the first respondent
...MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NATUREX LIMITED Plaintiff AND KATE ROGERS Defendant Hearing: by memoranda filed on 6, 20 and 30 September and 5 and 19 October 2010 Judgment: 10 February 2011 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD Issues [1] On 4 August 2010 the plaintiff filed a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) seeking a hearing de novo. Twenty da...