Search Results

Search results for judgments on line.

2885 items matching your search terms

  1. Couper v Paki - Lloyd Alexander Couper (2012) 281 Aotea MB 156 (281 AOT 156) [pdf, 173 KB]

    ...BETWEEN LLOYD ALEXANDER COUPER Applicant AND GABRIEL NOPERA PAKI Respondent Hearing: 51 WAR 250 - 293, 28 March 2012 (Heard at Rotorua) Appearances: Mr I Peterson for the Applicant Mr M Batchelor for the Respondent Judgment: 4 April 2012 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Solicitors: Ian Peterson, Potts & Hodgson, PO Box 444, Opotiki, for the Applicant ian@pottshodgson.co.nz Michael Batchelor, Lyon O’N...

  2. Hinaki - Whangara A5 (2023) 116 Tairāwhti MB 143 (116 TRW 143) [pdf, 421 KB]

    ...Whāngārā A5 NĀ By DARREN HINAKI Te kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 4 October 2022, 115 Tairawhiti MB 97-105 (Heard at Gisborne) Kanohi kitea: Appearances R Revington for applicant Whakataunga: Judgment date 13 January 2023 TE TUHINGA HUKIHUKI Ā TE KAIWHAKAWĀ MĀTUA TUARUA C L FOX Preliminary Judgment of Deputy Chief Judge C L Fox Copies to: R Revington, Woodward Chr...

  3. 2021-03-16 Transcript to end of day 5 [pdf, 2 MB]

    ...OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL PLAN CHANGE 7 – ENV-ENV-2020-CHC-127 (08 Mar 2021) to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan, but prior to the Environment Court hearing the appeal on 3 and 4 December 2014): [16] Since the Supreme Court judgement in EDS v NZ King Salmon Co Ltd [2014] NZRMA 195 there has been an increased awareness of the need to consider the hierarchy of planning documents, and the degree of control those 5 documents have over the required or permissible cont...

  4. 2021-03-17 ORC PC7 - Transcript (up to end of day 7) [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    ...OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL PLAN CHANGE 7 – ENV-ENV-2020-CHC-127 (08 Mar 2021) to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan, but prior to the Environment Court hearing the appeal on 3 and 4 December 2014): [16] Since the Supreme Court judgement in EDS v NZ King Salmon Co Ltd [2014] NZRMA 195 there has been an increased awareness of the need to consider the hierarchy of planning documents, and the degree of control those 5 documents have over the required or permissible cont...

  5. [2013] NZEmpC 27 Hall v Dionex Pty Ltd [pdf, 109 KB]

    ...Authority proceedings BETWEEN PETER DAVID HALL Applicant AND DIONEX PTY LTD Respondent Hearing: 7 February 2013 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Tony Drake, counsel for plaintiff Daniel Erickson, counsel for defendant Judgment: 7 March 2013 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] The applicant has applied, pursuant to s 178(3) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act), for special leave to have an employment relationship problem rem...

  6. [2013] NZEmpC 141 2Air NZ Ltd v Kerr [pdf, 88 KB]

    ...Hearing: (on the papers by way of submissions dated 10, 18, 22 and 24 July 2013) Counsel: Jennifer Mills and Christie Hall, counsel for the plaintiff Peter Chemis, Hamish Kynaston and Jennifer Howes, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 26 July 2013 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD The application [1] On 11 July 2013, Air New Zealand Limited (the plaintiff) filed an application for further disclosure. As the case had been granted urgency...

  7. [2025] NZEmpC 217 Fuimaono v Ritchies Murphy Transport Solutions Limited [pdf, 186 KB]

    ...BETWEEN FERETI FUIMAONO Plaintiff AND RITCHIES MURPHY TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: E Sooula, counsel for plaintiff P Swarbrick, counsel for defendant Judgment: 7 October 2025 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M S KING (Application for security for costs) [1] This judgment resolves an application by Ritchies Murphy Transport Solutions Ltd (Ritchies) for an order that Mr F...

  8. Mr-Rasheeds-Authorities.pdf [pdf, 7.1 MB]

    ...Interested Parties - A Rasheed, 8 October 2021 CONSEIL DE L’EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION CASE OF HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Application no. 24746/94) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 4 May 2001 FINAL 04/08/2001 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. 469 470 HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGM...

  10. Heng v Walshaw [pdf, 550 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 00734 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN JOHN MONTGOMERY HENG AND ANNE ELIZABETH HENG Claimants AND CHRISTOPHER WALSHAW AND MARGARET ANNE WALSHAW First respondents (Intituling continued next page) Appearances: Scott Galloway, counsel for the claimants Chris Walshaw, for the first respondents Tim Cleary, counsel for the second respondent John Morrison, co