Search Results

1. [2024] NZEmpC 5 MGE New Zealand 2010 Limited & McKay Ltd v Campbell [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...CAMPBELL First Respondent AND JAYCEE ELECTRIX LIMITED Second Respondent Hearing: 18 January 2024 (Heard at Auckland by telephone) Appearances: D Grindle, counsel for applicants No appearance for respondents Judgment: 19 January 2024 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M S KING Introduction [1] MGE New Zealand 2010 Ltd and McKay Ltd have applied without notice for search orders against Mr James Campbell, a former employee of the applicants, an...

2. Offord v Patel [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...decision of Heath J in Body Corporate 188529 v North Shore City Council & Ors (Sunset Case) 30 April 2008, CIV 2004-404-3230. [51] In the Sunset Case, Heath J defined the duty of a territorial authority as follows: 18 [220] In my judgment, a territorial authority owes a duty of care to anyone who acquires a unit, the intended use of which has been disclosed as residential in the plans and specifications submitted with the building consent application or is known to...

3. [2013] NZEmpC 40 B v Virgin Australia (NZ) Employment & Crewing Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   B V VIRGIN AUSTRALIA (NZ) EMPLOYMENT AND CREWING LIMITED, PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS PACIFIC BLUE EMPLOYMENT AND CREWING LIMITED NZEmpC CHCH [2013] NZEmpC 40 [20 March 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 40 CRC 6/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN B Plaintiff AND VIRGIN AUSTRALIA (NZ) EMPLOYMENT AND CREWING LIMITED, PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS PACIFIC BLUE EMPLOYMENT AND CREWING L

4. [2024] NZEnvC 025 Shundi Queenstown Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...objectives and policies and to decline consent. [49] That particular feature of the proposal is addressed in the modified access arrangements and associated proposed conditions. Matters of functionality of the road network involve questions of judgement through the informed eyes of traffic engineers. We give significant weight to the fact that the modified arrangements were developed with the assistance of Messrs Hewett and Smith and have their full endorsement. Furthermore, in its...

5. Recommendations Recap 2024 Q2 [pdf, 884 KB]

   Recommendations Recap A summary of coronial recommendations and comments made between 1 April and 30 June 2024 Office of the Chief Coroner | 2024 (2) i Coroners’ recommendations and comments Coroners perform essential functions within our society. They inquire into a range of unexpected deaths to establish the identity of the person who has died and the cause and circumstances of their death. While inquiring into a death,

6. 2021-03-23 Transcript up to end of day 9 [pdf, 4.5 MB]

   ...OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL PLAN CHANGE 7 – ENV-ENV-2020-CHC-127 (08 Mar 2021) to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan, but prior to the Environment Court hearing the appeal on 3 and 4 December 2014): [16] Since the Supreme Court judgement in EDS v NZ King Salmon Co Ltd [2014] NZRMA 195 there has been an increased awareness of the need to consider the hierarchy of planning documents, and the degree of control those 5 documents have over the required or permissible cont...

7. BORA Immigration Bill [pdf, 480 KB]

   Immigration Bill 20 July 2007 Attorney-General LEGAL ADVICE CONSISTENCY WITH THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 1990: IMMIGRATION BILL 1. On 12 June 2007 we provided you with preliminary advice as to whether the Immigration Bill (PCO 7520/13) is consistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 ("the Bill of Rights Act"). We have now had an opportunity to view version 20 (PCO 7520/20) of the Bill. We understand that the Bill was considered by the Cabinet Legislati

8. Roborgh v Lay [pdf, 303 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 00062 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN LYNNE ROBORGH and LEON JOHN ROBORGH Claimants AND No First or Second Respondents AND STEPHEN BRIAN LAY Third Respondent AND JESSOP TOWNSEND LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WATERPROOFING LIMITED (in Liquidation) Sixth Respondent AND No Seventh Respondent AND TIMOTHY

9. LCRO 27/2021 BK v RQ (27 August 2021) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...on the evidence before her. Nevertheless, as the Guidelines properly recognise, where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. [36] More recently, the High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:2 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determinati...

10. DeMarco v Accident Compensation Corporation (Independence Allowance) [2024] NZACC 189 (25 November 2024) [pdf, 339 KB]

    ...CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 29 April 2024 Heard at: Hastings/ Heretaunga Appearances: The appellant in person M Boyle and S Kinsler for the respondent Evidence and supplementary submissions completed: 6 September 2024 Judgment: 25 November 2024 ___________________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D L HENARE [ Independence Allowance, Part 4, Schedule 1 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ____________...