2885 items matching your search terms
...(NEE SKIPPER) AND KEVIN EUGENE SKIPPER Applicants AND DABO SKIPPER AND DARREN SKIPPER Respondents Hearing: 12 November 2018, 202 Waiāriki MB 118 - 133 (Heard at Ōpōtiki) Appearances: W Rika for Applicants Judgment: 30 April 2019 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD Copies to: W Rika, 15 Bedwardine Street, Rotorua 3010, walterrika@slingshot.co.nz mailto:walterrika@slingshot.co.nz 211 Waiarik...
...horse, and all other relevant circumstances of the supply (s7). 11. The test for fitness for purpose is whether the horse was reasonably fit for racing, unless the circumstances show that the purchaser did not rely on the supplier’s skill and judgement in making that determination (s8). 12. I am satisfied that the horse was not of acceptable quality, but only in relation to the immediate lameness experienced shortly after arrival. This is so for the following reasons: (a) I...
...Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 29 July 2022 Heard at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: S Macann on behalf of the appellant Mr L Hawes-Gandar and Ms F Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 16 August 2022 ____________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C J McGUIRE [Personal Injury s 26 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ___________________________________________...
...buyer, to show the buyer relies on the seller’s skill and judgement and where the goods are of a description that it is in the seller’s business to supply. 24. Despite K’s evidence that he told V LTD’s employee he needed the truck for pipe lining, I find the truck was not selected by either V LTD or K on this basis, K did not appear to rely on V LTD’s skill or judgement in this regard, nor was the truck specifically adapted by V LTD for this purpose. I find it was a truck...
...TAI E RUA PAA MAAORI RESERVATION TRUST Ngā kaitono Applicants Nohoanga: Hearing 26 January 2022, 234 Waikato Maniapoto MB 20-30 (Heard at Hamilton) Kanohi kitea: Appearances K Katipo for Applicants Whakataunga: Judgment date 31 October 2023 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ R P MULLINS Judgment of R P Mullins Copies to: K Katipo, McCaw Lewis, PO Box 9348, Hamilton 3240, Kylee.Katipo@mccawlewis.co.nz...
...Hearing: 3 October 2024 Held at: Wellington/Whanganui-a-Tara by AVL Appearances: H Menneer for the Appellant; Ms Lewis also attended L Hawes-Gandar and F Becroft for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 4 October 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for treatment injury – ss 26, 32(1), Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 2 Ap...
...occurred a day later, and after one where Ms Grey realised she had “slipped” a couple of times, she ought to have been more on guard, and her carelessness is less understandable. We consider that Ms Grey’s enthusiasm about the issue clouded her judgment, and that she did not consider carefully enough the prohibition of identifying particulars. She knew Gault J had ordered that the baby be referred to as “Baby W”, this was not a case of ignorance, but rather carelessness an...
...BARRY LIVINGSTONE Te kaitono Applicant ME And LILLIAN MAERE NEE RAWHITI Te kaiurupare Respondent Nohoanga: Hearing 495 Aotea MB 115-118 dated 20 December 2024 (Heard at Tūrangi, 16 January 2025) Whakataunga: Judgment date 16 January 2025 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ M J DOOGAN Judgment of Judge M J Doogan 496 Aotea MB 46 [1] I am going to give a preliminary view on some issues, and at th...
...Respondents Coram: Judge P J Savage (Presiding) Judge L R Harvey Judge D J Ambler Appearances: Mr I J D Hall, for the Appellant Mr P Warbrick and Ms A Rivers, for the Respondents Hearing: 13 November 2008 (Heard at Christchurch) Judgment: 20 May 2010 JUDGMENT OF THE APPELLATE COURT 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 168 CONTENTS Introduction [1] Arguments [8] The appeal and related applications [14] Further evidence [22] Applications for l...
...of these landscapes. [16] While a natural feature is typically distinct and clearly legible in biophysical terms, the geographic extent of a landscape is typically more subtle and , hence, less readily able to be defined by mapping.11 Informed judgment is called for. The boundaries of individual landscapes are not shown on the DV's planning maps or elsewhere. Rather, the planning maps show a more general ONL notation over large parts of the Rural zone planning maps. Nor does...