2885 items matching your search terms
...45-92 dated 2 August 2016 54 Tākitimu MB 55-101 dated 14 October 2016 (Heard at Hastings) Appearances: C Bidois for the Trustees C Bennett for the Respondents Judgment: 7 July 2017 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Copies to: C Bidois: East Brewster Solicitors, 1137 Pukuatua Street, Rotorua DX JP 30017 C Bennett: Langley Twigg Lawyers, 66 West Quay, Ahuriri Napier 4140 DX MP 70034...
...AND FENGQIN YANG AND JINFU ZHANG Defendants Hearing: 7 and 8 April 2014 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: T Delamere and C Fredric, advocates for plaintiff F Joychild QC, counsel and L Wong, advocate for defendants Judgment: 9 May 2014 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] Migrant and would-be migrant workers are vulnerable to exploitation. There has been a discernible upswing in cases involving a failure to comply with minimum emplo...
...amounts should be set off against the payments due to the landlord. [6] The end result was that there was a considerable degree of uncertainty over the amount that was actually due to the landlord. [7] In June 2009 the landlord applied for summary judgement against the DL in the sum of $164,175.88 plus interest and costs. [8] Mr and Mrs DL instructed ABL Legal to represent them. Their first meeting was with Mr WR. He reviewed the proceedings and subsequently reported to Mr and M...
...Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION INC Defendant Hearing: 21 March 2018 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: R Towner and R Compson, counsel for plaintiff P Cranney and C Mayston, counsel for defendant Judgment: 22 June 2018 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS Introduction [1] AsureQuality Ltd (Asure) challenges a determination of the Employment Relations Authority.1 The challenge is pursued on a de novo bas...
...Respondent Nohoanga: Hearings 21 July 2020, 65 Te Waipounamu MB 154-199 (Heard at Blenheim) Kanohi kitea: Appearances P Radich and S Wadworth for the applicant M Hardy-Jones and K Lawson for the respondent Whakataunga: Judgment date 17 March 2021 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ Judgment of Judge S F Reeves 69 Te Waipounamu MB 252 Hei tīmatanga kōrero - Introduction [1] On 25 May 2019, Phillip MacDonald filed an appli...
...BROWN, DIANA BROWN, JANIE BROWN, JULIE BROWN, PRISCILLA BROWN AND TED BROWN AS TRUSTEES OF THE HEKE BROWN WHĀNAU TRUST Applicants Hearing: 11 December 2018, 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 1044-1061 (Heard at Whangarei) Judgment: 23 April 2019 JUDGMENT OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 312 Introduction [1] The applicants are trustees of the Heke Brown Whānau Trust. They have filed...
...OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL PLAN CHANGE 7 – ENV-ENV-2020-CHC-127 (08 Mar 2021) to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan, but prior to the Environment Court hearing the appeal on 3 and 4 December 2014): [16] Since the Supreme Court judgement in EDS v NZ King Salmon Co Ltd [2014] NZRMA 195 there has been an increased awareness of the need to consider the hierarchy of planning documents, and the degree of control those 5 documents have over the required or permissible cont...
...and that there possibly could be more in the future.1 The Dawsons purchased the property without seeking any expert advice or requiring a LIM, and apart from representation from the seller‟s agent, Barney Cornaga, relied solely upon their own judgment. [2] The home was the configuration, size and locality that the Dawsons wanted for their next family home. All of this induced them to make an unconditional offer to buy at the maximum stretch of their finances. The offer they...
...Section 326B, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Mangamuka West 3B2A Block BETWEEN NGAWAI TUSON Applicant Hearing: 20 November 2013 17 November 2014 4 May 2015 (Heard at Kaitaia) Judgment: 23 February 2018 PRELIMINARY DECISION OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE FOX 168 Taitokerau MB 18 Introduction [1] This decision concerns an application by Ngawai Tuson for an order pu...
...view on the evidence before her. Nevertheless, as the Guidelines properly recognise, where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. [22] More recently, the High Court has described review by this Office in the following way:7 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determinati...