Search Results

Search results for judgments on line.

2885 items matching your search terms

  1. [2009] NZEmpC WC 7/09 NZ Meat Workers Union v Silver Fern Farms [pdf, 48 KB]

    ...RELATED TRADES UNION INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND SILVER FERN FARMS LTD (FORMERLY PPCS LTD) Defendant Hearing: 17 February 2009 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: Megan Gundesen, Counsel for Plaintiff T P Cleary, Counsel for Defendant Judgment: 20 April 2009 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C M SHAW Introduction [1] This is an application for declarations about the meaning and effect of the annual holiday clauses in two collective agreements. The plaintiff has challenge...

  2. The Chief Executive of Land Information New Zealand v Taare - Awapuni 1F3 (2016) 60 Tairawhiti MB 90 (60 TRW 90) [pdf, 203 KB]

    ...MATTER OF Awapuni 1F3 BETWEEN AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF LAND INFORMATION NEW ZEALAND Applicant MATHEW TAARE AND OTHERS Respondents Hearings: Appearances: Prior Judgments: 37 Tairawhiti MB 127-130, 31 January 2014 38 Tairawhiti MB 253-260, 31 March 2014 44 Tairawhiti MB 294, 20 January 2015 50 Tairawhiti MB 150-153, 6 July 2015 52 Tairawhiti MB 103-111, 3 September 2015 G Melvin and B Arapere...

  3. Puha v Crawford - Mokoia 19A (2021) 439 Aotea MB 68 (439 AOT 68) [pdf, 363 KB]

    ...Nohoanga: Hearing 15 December 2020, 427 Aotea MB 17-36 20 November 2018, 393 Aotea MB 158-173 (Heard at Whanganui) Kanohi kitea: Appearances C Batt, for the Applicant M Tucker, D Ihaia and E Ihaia in person Whakataunga: Judgment 15 October 2021 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ L R HARVEY Judgment of Judge L R Harvey Copies to: C Batt, Batt Law, P O Box 277, Masterton 5840 chrstine@battlaw.co.nz mailto:chrstine@battlaw....

  4. 04-Appendix-Four-DCR_Part1.pdf [pdf, 23 MB]

    ...and any unauthorized use or reliance is at the recipient’s own risk. Stantec has assumed all information received from the Client and third parties in the preparation of the Report to be correct. While Stantec has exercised a customary level of judgment or due diligence in the use of such information, Stantec assumes no responsibility for the consequences of any error or omission contained therein. This Report is intended solely for use by the Client in accordance with Stantec’s con...

  5. Maketu Estates Ltd v CAC 403 & Robb [2016] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 184 KB]

    ...disregard them, as they consider the relevant issues in particular context of the Act. The present case is an appeal brought under the provisions of the Act, which expressly allows for appeals against decisions of CACs. This is not the case in the judgments cited for the Authority. Cooke and Osborne were cases of judicial review under the Judicature Amendment Act 1972. We consider that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal on appeal should not be circumscribed by judgments from a di...

  6. [2020] NZEmpC 13 Elisara v Allianz New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 223 KB]

    ...TITIIMAEA EUGENE ELISARA Plaintiff AND ALLIANZ NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: S Worthy and HG King, counsel for plaintiff H Waalkens QC and J MacGibbon, counsel for defendant Judgment: 26 February 2020 COSTS JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] Mr Elisara claimed that he had been unjustifiably dismissed from his position as Chief Executive Officer of the defendant’s New Zealand branch. Th...

  7. Ruha - Succession to Takerei Ruha [2025] Chief Judge's MB 30 (2025 CJ 30) [pdf, 1 MB]

    ...Takerei Ruha NĀ By JACKY RUHA Te Kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 27 March 2024, 2024 Chief Judge’s MB 324-332 26 September 2024, 2024 Chief Judge’s MB 1788-1814 (Heard at Wellington via zoom) Whakataunga: Judgment date 17 January 2025 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ MATUA C L FOX Judgment of Chief Judge C L Fox 2025 Chief Judge's MB 31 Hei timatanga kōrero Introduction [1] Th...

  8. Te Au Reka Phase 2 Court Rules Consultation Paper [pdf, 235 KB]

    ...access to victim impact statements under this Act and the CPRs will be preserved within Te Au Reka. • Service of documents and other information Service by the court: Where the court is required to serve information, including orders and judgments, but the information is not required to be personally served, the court will always serve through the e-solution if: o the party is represented by a lawyer who has been nominated as the party’s address for service and the lawyer h...

  9. National Standards Committee v Young [2017] NZLCDT 41 [pdf, 315 KB]

    ...filing in the High Court and the “doomed appeal” in the Court of Appeal. Those actions are grounds for grave doubts as to his professional competence, consistent with his admission under oath that he is not a prudent solicitor. I forward this judgment and the notes of evidence to the NZ Law Society for the consideration of the professional disciplinary consequences of that. I do not consider his actions constitute contempt of court.”4 (emphasis ours) [27] His Honour Palmer J als...