Search Results

1. [2008] NZEmpC AC 17A/08 Air Nelson Ltd v NZ Airline Pilots Association IUOW Inc and anor [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...PILOTS ASSOCIATION INDUSTRIAL UNION OF WORKERS INC First Defendant AND SIMON PALMER Second Defendant Hearing: 23 May 2008 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Kevin Thompson, Counsel for Plaintiff Richard McCabe, Counsel for Defendant Judgment: 23 May 2008 Reasons: 28 May 2008 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] These are the reasons for the brief oral judgment given at the end of last Friday’s hearing dismissing Air Nelson’s applicatio...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 160 Hawthenden Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 21 MB]

   ...of what is sought to be protected. Listing those values that inform why a feature or landscape is an ONF or ONL is an important further element of setting out what is sought to be protected. That is particularly given the significant element of judgment required to select features and landscapes as "sufficiently natural" to warrant identification as ONFs or ONLs. In particular, that selection includes choices as to the significance or otherwise of human modifications to a...

3. [2020] NZEmpC 71 Grigorovich v Precise Ltd [pdf, 344 KB]

   ...for leave to adduce further evidence BETWEEN IGOR GRIGOROVICH Applicant AND PRECISE LIMITED Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Applicant in person SF Martin, counsel for respondent Judgment: 27 May 2020 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] The applicant has applied for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority.1 The intended challenge is to...

4. Deputy Registrar - Kapowai A1A, A1B, A2A, A2B1, A2B2, A3, C1 and C2 Blocks (2010) 7 Taitokerau MB 125 (7 TTK 125) [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 7 TAITOKERAU MB 125 (7 TTK 125) A20100008406 IN THE MATTER OF Kapowai A1A, A1B, A2A, A2B1, A2B2, A3, C1 and C2 Blocks ML 12835 ML 12839 DEPUTY REGISTRAR Applicant (Heard at Whangarei) Judgment: 30 June 2010 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER Introduction [1] A survey requisition has been issued under s 332 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 (“1993 Act”) in relation to Kapowai A1A, A1B, A2A, A2B1, A2B2, A3...

5. ZQN Apartments TRI 2021-100-001 Procedural Order 9 [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...submission that the BNZ Branch Properties decision is a major departure from the established case law and the decision of Body Corporate 328392 has fully examined Justice Clark’s reasoning in BNZ Branch Properties and declined to follow her judgment. Counsel for the fourth respondent submits that this is not a complicated matter and the claim against the fourth respondent is quite clearly time-barred under s 393(2) of the Building Act. I agree with that submission and my reaso...

6. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Tennet [2022] NZLCDT 37 (26 October 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...generally charged $3,450, Mr Tennet exhibited18 two pages that presented as copy printouts of searches of his 14 Bundle p 238. 15 Bundle p 190. 16 Bundle p 232. 17 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2009] 1 NZLR 1 (SC) at [101] (majority judgment). 18 Mr Tennet’s affidavit 25 August 2022, Exhibit B. 7 “Practise Account” for payments referencing the Trust. In respect of each of those 20 entries,19 the names of his clients were redacted. None was less than...

7. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...other parties. The Morars’ application for removal was declined. Joinder of Body Corporate 88315 [15] In closing submissions the claimants sought to join Body Corporate 88315 as a further respondent to the proceedings relying on the judgment of Heath J in Body Corporate 188529 & Ors v North Shore City Council & Ors (No. 3) (Sunset Terraces) [30 April 2008] HC, Auckland, CIV 2004-404-3230. Counsel for the claimants submitted that if a body corporate has standing fo...

8. [2025] NZEmpC 167 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v Maritime Union of New Zealand and Anor [pdf, 330 KB]

   ...(Heard at Christchurch) Appearances: R Wooders and Z Fong, counsel for Lyttelton Port Company Limited S Mitchell KC and A Drumm, counsel for Maritime Union of New Zealand and Rail and Maritime Transport Union Incorporated Judgment: 8 August 2025 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN Table of Contents This judgment resolves two challenges ................................................................. [1] The background to these proceedings is a restruct...

9. BE v W Ltd & KN [2024] NZDT 885 (15 December 2024) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...interest in any land, or to any franchise is in question.” (S.11(5) Disputes Tribunal Act). 13. KN and W Ltd (the respondents) have said in consolidated submissions dated 6 November 2024 at Clause 6 “To be clear, it is not accepted that the judgement (meaning the District Court Judgement in [redacted]) was necessarily correct on the encroachment point. This would need to be determined on detailed surveying evidence, presumably by a cadastral surveyor. No detailed surveying eviden...

10. Human Rights Act 1993

    A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z A Access to Tribunal file – application by plaintiff for return of certain documents – allegation by plaintiff of theft and destruction of documents – importance of maintaining Tribunal’s file intact – Public Records Act 2005, ss 17 and 18 Mullane v Attorney-Ge

    Located in:

    1. Tribunals >
    2. Human rights >
    3. Decisions - Index