2845 items matching your search terms
...was uncovered by the Agency, which alerted the banks. The total loss to lenders amounted to $3,844,287.37, on loans advanced of $12,988,950. 1 This summary has been prepared by reference to the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Arysomayajula v The Queen [2011] NZCA 633, and the sentencing notes of District Court Judge A E Kiernan in Serious Fraud Office v Cavanagh CRI-2009-004-023457, 22 October 2009. [6] On 3 October 2007,...
...in the course of the Stewart Case and the Hobbs Case. This matter was also raised in another way for Mr Gilbert, with a suggestion that some charges arose out of acts which were based on what could be fairly classified as reasonable subjective judgments. We do not consider matters under this head assist Mr Gilbert with his application. The consideration of related matters in other judicial forums was not undertaken with a view to considering matters of professional disciplin...
...COOPER Second Respondent AND OCEANIA INSURANCE BROKERS LIMITED Third Respondent Hearing: 21 September 2023 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: J Baigent, counsel for applicant S Lapthorne, counsel for respondents Judgment: 9 November 2023 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE KATHRYN BECK Background [1] P.I.C Insurance Brokers Ltd (PIC), has applied for pre-commencement discovery in relation to claims which it wishes to commence against two of its pri...
2 advice tendered by Ministers of the Crown and officials; and • section 9(2)(g)(i) to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and frank expression of opinions; and • section 9(2)(h) to maintain legal professional privilege. 4. Reforms to the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 Cabinet Minute CAB-22-MIN- 0457.02 Cabinet Office 25 October 2022 Some information has been withheld in accordance with section 9(2)(f)(iv) to maintain
NATIONAL OVERVIEW volume i i i Professor Alan Ward Waitangi Tribunal Rangahaua Whanui Series WAITANGI TRIBUNAL 1997 A Waitangi Tribunal publication © Copyright Waitangi Tribunal 1997 isbn 1-86956-209-7 Edited and produced by the Waitangi Tribunal Published by GP Publications, Wellington, New Zealand Printed by GP Print, Wellington, New Zealand Set in Times Roman This report was commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui research programme. Any views ex
...DYNEA NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 18 June 2007 (Heard at Nelson) Court: Chief Judge G L Colgan Judge B S Travis Judge C M Shaw Appearances: Nicole Ironside, Counsel for the Plaintiff Shan Wilson, Counsel for the Defendant Judgment: 10 July 2007 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF THE FULL COURT [1] This judgment deals with the question of what is before the Employment Court on a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority which has...
...TREVOR HOLMAN Plaintiff AND CTC AVIATION TRAINING (NZ) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 15 and 16 November 2016 (Heard at Hamilton) Appearances: R McCabe, counsel for plaintiff E Burke, counsel for defendant Judgment: 18 May 2017 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS Introduction [1] These proceedings arise from an allegation by the plaintiff, Trevor Holman, that his former employer, the defendant CTC Aviation Training (NZ) Ltd (...
...heritage order and district plan provisions, but were unable to agree as to whether s 6(f) and Part 2 generally, must be directly considered. At the heart of the disagreement was the now legally thorny consideration of whether an "overall broad judgment" is required under Part 2 of the RMA. [17] The parties took somewhat opposing stances on the application of each of the considerations in subsections (a) to (c) of s 195(3). We will not set them out here because each will b...
...heritage order and district plan provisions, but were unable to agree as to whether s 6(f) and Part 2 generally, must be directly considered. At the heart of the disagreement was the now legally thorny consideration of whether an "overall broad judgment" is required under Part 2 of the RMA. [17] The parties took somewhat opposing stances on the application of each of the considerations in subsections (a) to (c) of s 195(3). We will not set them out here because each will b...
CLAIM NO: 00540 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN GRAEME TUCKER and GLENYS TUCKER and STEPHEN SUDBURY as trustees of the Ngahere Trust Claimants AND ALLAN TUCKER First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 13, 14 & 15 December 2004 Appearances: John Ross, counsel for the Claimants David Grindle, counsel for the First Respondent Roger Bowden, counsel for th