Search Results

1. Feaver v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to High Court) [2024] NZACC 51 [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION First Respondent AND ALLIANCE GROUP LIMITED Second Respondent Submissions: P Sara for the Applicant S Winter for the Second Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 26 March 2024 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Leave to appeal to the High Court – s 162 Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of His Honour, Judge McG...

2. [2020] NZREADT 34 - Hammond v Real Estate Agents Authority (11 August 2020) [pdf, 386 KB]

   ...correctly stated that a breach of a Rule constitutes unsatisfactory conduct. We turn to consider whether the Committee erred in the exercise of its discretion to take no further action in respect of that breach. [64] The Committee referred to the judgment of his Honour Justice Heath in the High Court in Vosper v Real Estate Agents Authority.13 The particular issues dealt with in the High Court were findings by a Complaints Assessment Committee, upheld by the

3. Transcript - Hearing - PC7 - 8 to 26 March 2021 [updated] [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju

4. Transcript - Hearing - PC7 8 - 26 March [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   ...OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL PLAN CHANGE 7 – ENV-ENV-2020-CHC-127 (08 Mar 2021) to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan, but prior to the Environment Court hearing the appeal on 3 and 4 December 2014): [16] Since the Supreme Court judgement in EDS v NZ King Salmon Co Ltd [2014] NZRMA 195 there has been an increased awareness of the need to consider the hierarchy of planning documents, and the degree of control those 5 documents have over the required or permissible cont...

5. Teina Pora compensation claim quantum report [pdf, 9 MB]

   ...to take account of the presence and/or absence of the factors outlined in para 4 of the guidelines. This is the second step in the process identified above.13 21. The way in which this part of the exercise is to be undertaken was set out in the judgment of Keane J in Akatere v Attorney General,14 adopting as correct the approach summarised in a letter by the Chief Legal Counsel of the Ministry of Justice to the Queen's Counsel in that case, which read in part: liThe second stag...

6. Clarke v Gray - Poukawa 9G Trust (2016) 48 Takitimu MB 182 (48 TKT 182) [pdf, 346 KB]

   ...30 January 2013 36 Tākitimu MB 125-155 dated 6 November 2014 46 Tākitimu MB 258 – 270 dated 3 December 2015 Appearances: C Bennett for Meafou Clarke C Bidois for Faye Walker P Harman for Thomas Clarke L Watson for Jim Gray Judgment: 29 April 2016 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Solicitors: C Bennett, Langley Twigg Law, P O Box 446, Napier 4140, cara@langleytwigg.co.nz C Bidois, East Brewster, P O Box 1742, Rotorua 3040, curtis.bidois@east...

7. Herbst v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for personal injury) [2024] NZACC 192 (27 November 2024) [pdf, 255 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 192 ACAR 122/24; and 126/24 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MICHELLE HERBST Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 20 November 2024 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau District Court Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented

8. [2016] NZEmpC 145 S v I Ltd [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...and 23 March, 1, 15 and 29 July, 12 and 23 August, 1 and 8 September and 28 October 2016) Appearances: A Shaw, counsel for the plaintiff and M Osmond, advocate for the plaintiff R Harrison and E McWatt, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 4 November 2016 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 4) OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] S seeks an order for further and better discovery. I Limited opposes this, stating that it has already given extensive disclosure a...

9. Pook v Matchitt - Matangareka 3B [2019] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2019 APPEAL 167) [pdf, 671 KB]

   ...Appellate Court MB 558-603 (Heard at Rotorua) Court: Deputy Chief Judge C L Fox (Presiding) Judge L R Harvey Judge S R Clark Appearances: S Webster for First Appellant C Bidois for Second Appellants T Wara for Respondent Judgment: 12 April 2019 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Copies to: S Webster, Koning Webster Lawyers, P O Box 11120, Papamoa 3151 spencer@kwlaw.co.nz C Bidois, East Brewster Lawyers, P O Box 1742, Rotorua 3040 cur...

10. [2019] NZEnvC 109 Ngati Pukenga ki Pakikaikutu v Heritage NZ Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 6.8 MB]

    ...appeal is the HNZPTA and not the RMA. As the Court said in King, the procedural provisions for this appeal are those in the RMA. While the listing of matters to which the Court must have regard in s59(1) does not limit our power under the RMA, our judgment on the issues and our determination must be undertaken in light of the purpose and principles of the HNZPT A. 7 [23) The Court in Tuhakaraina & Ors v Pouhere Taonga (New Zealand Historic Places Trust)8 described the task: .....