2885 items matching your search terms
...permanent non-publication BETWEEN VGM Plaintiff AND JXC Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: S Mitchell KC and A Drumm, counsel for plaintiff M Dew KC and D Josephs, counsel for defendant Judgment: 7 August 2025 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 4) OF JUDGE M S KING (Application for non-publication) [1] These proceedings were brought as a challenge to the determination of the Employment Relations Authority (...
...urge her, in her own interest, to obtain competent counsel to file evidence and submissions so we can better understand her circumstances. [20] We direct the Standards Committee to file any evidence and penalty submissions within 14 days of this judgment. We direct Ms Holdaway to file any evidence and penalty submissions within 14 days thereafter. 9 Bundle p 172. 10 Auckland Standards Committee v Brill [2022] NZLCDT 3 at [34]. See also Parlane v New Zealand Law Society (Waikat...
...ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 24 March 2025 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: G Pollak and G Chandok, counsel for plaintiff No appearance for defendant S Cook and TI Lamb, counsel for Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd Judgment: 10 April 2025 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 2) OF JUDGE KATHRYN BECK (Application to set aside appearance) [1] This judgment resolves an application by the plaintiff, Gregory Locke, to set aside an appearance under...
...[24] Counsel for the applicant refers to Justice France’s comments in Minister of Education v Reidy McKenzie Ltd on the jurisprudence relating to “without prejudice documents”.1 Counsel refers to the following excerpt from that judgment: The list of existing exceptions is settled. The important exceptions were set out by Robert Walker LJ as he then was in Unilever. …in Oceanbulk Shipping, Lord Clarke listed nine situations where evidence of without prejudice com...
New fees framework for family legal aid providers Summary of submissions, response and final decisions April 2012 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any othe
...necessary in the interests of justice to remedy the mistake or omission. [12] The principles that are applied to s 45 decisions have been previously set out in numerous decisions made by the Chief Judge and myself. These are to be found in the judgments Ashwell - Rawinia or Lavinia Ashwell (nee Russell)2 and in Tau v Nga Whanau O Morven & Glenavy - Waihao 903 Section IX Block.3 I do not propose to repeat those principles again in this judgment. [13] However, for the benefit o...
...Oppert v Thompson - Wharekawa 5B South 4B1 and Wharekawa 5B South 4B2B2B2 (2006) 21 Waikato Maniapoto Appellate MB 106 (21 APWM 106). 14 (2003) 132 Aotea MB 219 (132 AOT 219) at 221 http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/maori-land-court/documents/judgments/pdfs-maori-land-court-sittings/2005/Te%20Hiwi%20v%20Tahamata%20Inc%20-2005-%20148%20Aot%20265.pdf http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/maori-land-court/documents/judgments/pdfs-maori-appellate-court-sittings/2006/oramahoe%2017B2.pdf http:/...
...1 of 1 DOCUMENT: Linxplus (NZ) Case Name: New Zealand Amalgamated Engineering Printing & Manufacturing Union Inc v Energex Ltd Judge(s): Judge Shaw Court Name: Employment Court, Auckland File Number: AC 48-06, ARC 118-05 Judgment Date: Aug 28, 2006 Reported: [2006] 1 ERNZ 749 Case Summary: EMPLOYMENT LAW - challenge to ERA determination that bonding agreement not in breach of collective employ- ment agreement (CEA) - defendant had programme for upskill...
Minute Book: 299 ROT 177 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND W AIARIKI DISTRICT Al0050006269 UND ER Section 315, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 Hearing: Judgment: IN THE MATTER OF Waikuta 1B 2B2 - Create an easement TAWARI KAMETA Applicant 3 February 2006,296 Rotorua MB 67 2 August 2005, 292 Rotorua MB 297 7 June 2006 RESERVED INTERIM DECISION OF JUDGE P J SAVAGE [1] This is a reserved decision on an opposed application for an easement to lay water and sewage pipes...
...[1] By a notice of appeal dated 20 December 2013, the appellants appeal against a 3 December 2013 decision of a Complaints Assessment Committee of the Real Estate Agents Authority finding the licensee had engaged in the unsatisfactory conduct outlined below. [2] The Committee's finding followed a 15 May 2013 decision of His Honour Judge P R Spiller in the District Court at Hamilton that the licensee had engaged in conduct which was misleading or was likely to mislead; Piontecki &...