Search Results

Search results for judgments on line.

2844 items matching your search terms

  1. MacNaughtan v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury/Causation) [2023] NZACC 160 [pdf, 327 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 160 ACR 277/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JOHN MACNAUGHTAN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 25 August 2023 Heard at: Wellington Appearances: Mr R Mansfield KC for the Appellant Mr L Hawes-Gandar and Ms F Becroft for the Respondent Judgment: 3 Octo

  2. 2021-03-24 Transcript up to end of day 10 [pdf, 3.8 MB]

    ...OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL PLAN CHANGE 7 – ENV-ENV-2020-CHC-127 (08 Mar 2021) to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan, but prior to the Environment Court hearing the appeal on 3 and 4 December 2014): [16] Since the Supreme Court judgement in EDS v NZ King Salmon Co Ltd [2014] NZRMA 195 there has been an increased awareness of the need to consider the hierarchy of planning documents, and the degree of control those 5 documents have over the required or permissible cont...

  3. Waaka v Harrison - Poike 14 (Waimapu Marae) (2015) 101 Waikato Maniapoto MB 216 (101 WMN 216) [pdf, 255 KB]

    ...(99 Waikato Maniapoto MB 150-188) (Heard at Tauranga) Appearances: Mr G Elvin, Counsel for the Applicant Mr C F Reid, Counsel for the Ngāti Ruahine Charitable Trust Janice Harrison, Carlo Harrison and Helen Erena Ririnui in person Judgment: 21 July 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S R CLARK Copies to: Mr G Elvin, MacKenzie Elvin, Barristers & Solicitors, P O Box 14016, Tauranga 3143, graeme@mackenzie- elvin.com Mr C F Rei...

  4. Wouldes v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409), Tremain & Nathan [2017] NZREADT 67 [pdf, 343 KB]

    ...protecting the capital value of her investment in the apartment complex and the fact that she derived income from the sale of apartments in the complex. He submitted that her behaviour was influenced by her own interests, and her decision-making and judgement were clouded to the extent that she believed her lack of disclosure was lawful. [51] Ms Copeland submitted that Ms Nathan had a financial interest, albeit indirectly, in obtaining the best price for the apartment directly abov...

  5. [2021] NZACC 14 - Folland v ACC (12 January 2021) [pdf, 241 KB]

    ...OF THE ACT BETWEEN IVOR FOLLAND Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 10 November 2020 Held at: Nelson/Whakatū Appearances: S Macann for the appellant I Hunt for the respondent Judgment: 12 January 2021 ____________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE DENESE HENARE [Vocational Independence – ss 107 – 110 Accident Compensation Act 2001] __________________________...

  6. Derham v Accident Compensation Corporation (Gradual Process Injury; Suspension of Entitlements) [2025] NZACC 026 (17 February 2025) [pdf, 246 KB]

    ...BETWEEN CARL DERHAM Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 3 December 2025 Heard at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: Mr Hinchcliff for the appellant Ms Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 17 February 2025 ___________________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE JACQUI CLARK [Personal Injury, s 26; Work Related Gradual Process Injury, s 30; Suspension of Entitlements,...

  7. [2009] NZEmpC WC 8/09 New Zealand Meat Workers and related Trades Union v Taylor Preston Ltd [pdf, 64 KB]

    ...Plaintiff AND TAYLOR PRESTON LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 26 and 27 November 2008 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: Peter Cranney, S R Mitchell, and Anthea Hughes, Counsel for Plaintiff P C Chemis and J B Opie, Counsel for Defendant Judgment: 22 April 2009 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C M SHAW Introduction [1] Taylor Preston Limited operates a meatworks in Wellington. It employs up to about 600 people at any one time. Of these a minority are members of the plaintif...

  8. Tawera v Tawera – Waitangi A1A2 (2014) 39 Tairawhiti MB 45 (39 TRW 45) [pdf, 188 KB]

    ...WI PEWHAIRANGI BILL TAWERA DENISE TAWERA Respondents Hearing: 4 November 2013, 35 Tairawhiti MB 1-86 (Heard at Gisborne) Appearances: M Insley, counsel for the applicant N Weatherhead, counsel for the respondents Judgment: 24 April 2014 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX Solicitors: Tairawhiti Community Law Centre, PO Box 1053, Gisborne Attention: Marcia Insley E-mail: marcia@tairawhiticlc...

  9. Briefing for incoming Minister 2017 - Votes Justice and Courts [pdf, 1 MB]

    ...necessary to: a) Support the delivery of New Zealand’s courts and tribunals; b) Support independent judicial decision-making; c) Oversee the collection of infringements, court fines and reparations; d) Serve court documents; and e) Enforce civil judgments and orders. Both the Minister for Courts and the Minister of Justice are also responsible for the policy and legislation that underpins the operation of the courts. An overview of the court structure is provided in Appendix...

  10. LCRO 236-2015 DZ v EY [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...view on the evidence before her. Nevertheless, as the Guidelines properly recognise, where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. [14] More recently, the High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:2 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determ...