Search Results

1. [2017] NZEnvC 092 Golden Bay Grandstand v Heritage New Zealand [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT INTHE MAnER AND BETWEEN AND INTHEMAnER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 9 2 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 of an appeal under section 58 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMMUNITY TRUST (INCORPORATED) (ENV-2016-WLG-000065) Appellant HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application under section 316 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMM

2. Appendix-10_Michael-Thompson_s87F-Report_Water-Take-and-Allocation_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 893 KB]

   Section 87F Report – Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project (Ō2NL Project) Prepared by Michael Thompson – Water take and allocation 1 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of applications by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi) to Manawatū-Whanganui Regional Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council for resource consents to enable the construction, operation and maintenance of new state highway, shared

3. The Trustees of the Tauwhao Te Ngare Trust v Shaw - Tauwhao Te Ngare Block and a preliminary decision of the Chief Judge at 2013 CJ 567 [2014] Māori Appellate Court MB 394 (2014 APPEAL 394) [pdf, 377 KB]

   ...Hearing: 13 May 2014 at 2014 Maori Appellate Court MB 88-131 (Heard at Hamilton) Court: Deputy Chief Judge Fox (Presiding) Judge L R Harvey, Judge MJ Doogan Appearances: J Koning for the Appellants D Shaw in person Judgment: 23 December 2014 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT Copy to: Mr J Koning, Koning Webster Lawyers, PO Box 11120, Papamoa 3151 john@kwlaw.co.nz mailto:john@kwlaw.co...

4. [2020] NZEmpC 139 KiwiRail Ltd v Mobbs [pdf, 450 KB]

   ...ZEALAND INCORPORATED Second Defendant Hearing: 9, 10 and 23, 24 June 2020 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: P David QC and A Russell, counsel for the plaintiff P Cranney, counsel for the first and second defendants Judgment: 2 September 2020 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] At issue is the correct meaning of a retirement clause. Is its meaning plain, or is it such that it requires either corrective interpretation, or rect...

5. Abraham v Auckland City Council [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...by First Respondent” (dated 25 May 2007) was not forthcoming, but in the interests of completeness I briefly review below relevant established legal principles which underline council responsibility, and apply them to the facts. [47] The judgment in Stieller v Porirua City Council [1983] NZLR 628 usefully sets the tone: “The standard of care in all cases of negligence is that of the reasonable man (sic). The defendant, and indeed any other council, is not an insurer and...

6. [2021] NZEnvC 007 JJ Limited v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...it may be necessary to refer to the other sections of the plan and the objectives and policies of the plan itself. Interpreting a rule by rigid adherence to the wording of the particular rule itself would not, in our view, be consistent with a judgement of this Court in Rattray or with the requirements of the Interpretation Act. [37] We add that, for subordinate legislation, where examination of the immediate context of the plan leaves some uncertainty, it is also permissible to...

7. OIA-121395.pdf [pdf, 18 MB]

   ...which is why supporting diversity through equitable and inclusive practice matters. We’re proud of our diverse workforce and are committed to being an organisation where people feel they can express themselves authentically without fear of judgement. To ensure this, a DEI focus is being embedded throughout our People Experience work programme which contribute to supporting and developing our people and creating a positive workplace culture. These include psychosocial risk...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 190 Brown v Adams t/a Untouchable Hair & Skin [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...UNTOUCHABLE HAIR & SKIN Respondants Hearing: (on the papers filed on 24 June, 1 and 27 July, 18 and 25 September and 8 October 2015) Appearances: A Sharma, counsel for the applicant T Stallard, counsel for the respondents Judgment: 28 October 2015 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] Ms Brown has applied for a rehearing as to one issue arising from my substantive judgment of 28 May 2015, 1 wherein I found that she had misled t...

9. Hulton Patchell Limited v Mitchell - Pukeroa Oruawhata Trust (2010) 5 Waiariki MB 246 (5 WAR 246) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...BETWEEN HULTON PATCHELL LIMITED Applicant AND TE KIRIWERO MITCHELL Respondent Hearing: 16 February 2009, 338 Rotorua MB 228 (Heard at Rotorua) Appearances: Mr G Dennett for the Applicant Mr J P Kahukiwa for the Respondent Judgment: 31 March 2010 RESERVED DECISION OF JUDGE LR HARVEY Introduction [1] The trustees of Pukeroa Oruawhata Trust have applied for a variation of trust to delete clause 7(g) from the existing trust order. That clause was inserted by t...

10. Searancke - Part Pouawa 1 Subdivision 3 of Lot 2 Section 7 and Section 2-3 (2006) 164 Gisborne MB 247 (164 GIS 247) [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    ...1993 IN THE lvIATTER OF Pali Poua\va 1 Subdivision 3 of Lot 2 Section 7 and Section 2-3 Hearing: 1 i\.pri12005 (Heard at Gisborne) INGRID SEARANCKE Applicant Appearances: Mr A Mahuika for Mrs I Searancke Mr R Barber for lvII'S S Green Judgment: 11 April 2006 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C L FOX THE CASE [1] Although ostensibly about the termination of an ahu whenua trust, this case is about whanau differences over ho\v to nlanage whanau land. It is the story of an older genera...