Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 007 JJ Limited v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...it may be necessary to refer to the other sections of the plan and the objectives and policies of the plan itself. Interpreting a rule by rigid adherence to the wording of the particular rule itself would not, in our view, be consistent with a judgement of this Court in Rattray or with the requirements of the Interpretation Act. [37] We add that, for subordinate legislation, where examination of the immediate context of the plan leaves some uncertainty, it is also permissible to...

2. OIA-121395.pdf [pdf, 18 MB]

   ...which is why supporting diversity through equitable and inclusive practice matters. We’re proud of our diverse workforce and are committed to being an organisation where people feel they can express themselves authentically without fear of judgement. To ensure this, a DEI focus is being embedded throughout our People Experience work programme which contribute to supporting and developing our people and creating a positive workplace culture. These include psychosocial risk...

3. Wihelmus Hooft van Huijsduijnen v Woodley [2012] NZWHT Auckland 11 [pdf, 451 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-101-000028 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 11 BETWEEN RONALD ALOYSIUS WIHELMUS AND MARTINA HELENA MARIA HOOFT VAN HUIJSDUIJNEN Claimants AND EDWARD MERVYN JOHN AND LYNETTE ANNE CATHERINE WOODLEY First Respondents AND PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND ALAN GORDON MINTY (Removed) Third Respondent AND SAWREY CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND DONALD JOHN HAWINKELS Fifth Respo

4. Recommendations recap - issue 3 [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   Recommendations Recap A summary of coronial recommendations and comments made between 1 April–30 June 2012 issue 3 O F N E W Z E A L A N D CHIEF CORONER O F F I C E O F T H E http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/coroners-court/ Coronial Services of New Zealand Purongo O te Ao Kakarauri justice.govt.nz/coroners To request a copy of any full findings of cases contained in this edition, please contact our National Office. National Office Coronial.Information@justice.govt.nz +

5. Searancke - Part Pouawa 1 Subdivision 3 of Lot 2 Section 7 and Section 2-3 (2006) 164 Gisborne MB 247 (164 GIS 247) [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...1993 IN THE lvIATTER OF Pali Poua\va 1 Subdivision 3 of Lot 2 Section 7 and Section 2-3 Hearing: 1 i\.pri12005 (Heard at Gisborne) INGRID SEARANCKE Applicant Appearances: Mr A Mahuika for Mrs I Searancke Mr R Barber for lvII'S S Green Judgment: 11 April 2006 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C L FOX THE CASE [1] Although ostensibly about the termination of an ahu whenua trust, this case is about whanau differences over ho\v to nlanage whanau land. It is the story of an older genera...

6. Hide v Official Assignee (Confidentiality Claim) [2019] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...The interest is rather that of the inspecting party to see the other side’s relevant documents,11 and against this must be balanced the relevant confidentiality considerations. [14] In interpreting and applying EVA, s 69 we intend following the judgment of Winkelmann J in Financial Markets Authority v Hotchin [2014] NZHC 2732 at [26] to [29]. There is a two limb test: [14.1] An assessment whether the documents contain confidential information (or constitute confidential information)...

7. [2017] NZEmpC 12 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...Hearing: 18-26 October and 8-9 November 2016 and by way of further submissions dated 23 and 30 November 2016 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: C W Stewart and C Pallant-Drake, counsel for plaintiff A Sharp, counsel for defendant Judgment: 16 February 2017 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS Introduction [1] Ms Stormont worked with the defendant (Peddle Thorp) for around four years. Her employment agreement contained provision for...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 190 Brown v Adams t/a Untouchable Hair & Skin [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...UNTOUCHABLE HAIR & SKIN Respondants Hearing: (on the papers filed on 24 June, 1 and 27 July, 18 and 25 September and 8 October 2015) Appearances: A Sharma, counsel for the applicant T Stallard, counsel for the respondents Judgment: 28 October 2015 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] Ms Brown has applied for a rehearing as to one issue arising from my substantive judgment of 28 May 2015, 1 wherein I found that she had misled t...

9. Hulton Patchell Limited v Mitchell - Pukeroa Oruawhata Trust (2010) 5 Waiariki MB 246 (5 WAR 246) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...BETWEEN HULTON PATCHELL LIMITED Applicant AND TE KIRIWERO MITCHELL Respondent Hearing: 16 February 2009, 338 Rotorua MB 228 (Heard at Rotorua) Appearances: Mr G Dennett for the Applicant Mr J P Kahukiwa for the Respondent Judgment: 31 March 2010 RESERVED DECISION OF JUDGE LR HARVEY Introduction [1] The trustees of Pukeroa Oruawhata Trust have applied for a variation of trust to delete clause 7(g) from the existing trust order. That clause was inserted by t...

10. [2022] NZEnvC 025 Greater Wellington Regional Council v Adams [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI-A-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA IN THE J\.!IATIER BETWEEN AND AND AND AND AND AND Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 25 of an application for enforcement orders under s 314 of the Resource Management Act 1991 GREATER WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2021-WLG-000019) Applicant STUART LEE ADAMS First Respondent QUALITY NZ HOMES LIMITED Second Respondent HENRY ADAMS LIMITED Third Respondent LIORAH CELESTE ATKINSO