Search Results

1. FN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Suspension of Entitlements) [2023] NZACC 199 [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...This assessment showed that [the respondent] has severe problems with attention, mental flexibility and complex problem solving. Moderate issues are also highlighted in auditory and motor memory, math skills, simple problem solving and safety and judgement … It is advised that [the respondent] has further cognitive rehab on discharge and that she receive a neuropsychological assessment to isolate the issues she has and continue to rehab or compensate for deficits. [14] On 9 Oct...

2. CAC 10054 v Hume [2013] NZREADT 91 [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...misinterpreted. The defendant is scathing in his attitude to Mr W whom he regards as the cause and perpetrator of all these issues which he considers, arise over disputes between Mr W and the defendant over money. The defendant maintains that he has a Court judgment against Mr W for a substantial sum because commissions due to the defendant were not paid to him when he worked for Mr W. [33] The defendant seemed to be saying that his threatening and abusive telephone calls did not hap...

3. [2020] NZIACDT 49 - HQT v Singh (19 November 2020) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...regularly enforced by him. [73] According to Mr Singh, the open-plan office environment allows him to directly supervise all the staff. In liaising with clients, they are directed by him to ask for specific information. In this case, his considered judgement was employed to ensure the clerical work boundary was not overstepped. This is necessary to effectively and efficiently manage the business. He is always “vigilantly present” when interactions with clients happen, as w...

4. 03.-Evidence-of-Mr-Dean-Wilson-Muaupoko-Tribal-Authority.PDF [PDF, 402 KB]

   ...Crown and private purchasers. The result was a breakdown of tribal unity, cohesion and land loss.5 46. The Court proceeded to award shares in block 11 to 81 Muaūpoko individuals. The partition of Horowhenua 11 began a few days after the Court’s judgment was handed down.6 4 D.A. Armstrong. Muaūpoko Origins, Rohe, Customary Interests and Sites of Significance Historyworks - August, 2021, Page 100-102. 5 D.A. Armstrong. Muaūpoko Origins, Rohe, Customary Interests and Sites of Signific...

5. NZCASS Technical manual [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information.

6. [2007] NZEmpC AC 12/07 CE of Unitec Institute of Technology v Henderson [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...TECHNOLOGY Plaintiff AND KATHLEEN JOAN HENDERSON Defendant Hearing: 12, 13 and 14 June 2006 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Emma Butcher, Counsel for Plaintiff Christopher Patterson, Counsel, and Colin Ross, Advocate for Defendant Judgment: 19 March 2007 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] The issues for decision in this challenge (appeal) by hearing de novo from a determination of the Employment Relations Authority are: • whether Kathleen Henderson’...

7. [2009] NZEmpC AC 31/09 Ora Ltd v Kirkley [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...Relations Authority BETWEEN ORA LIMITED Plaintiff AND SONJA KIRKLEY Defendant Hearing: 18, 19 and 20 May 2009 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Giles Brant, counsel for plaintiff Lawrence Ponniah and Bethany Harper, counsel for defendant Judgment: 4 September 2009 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS Introduction [1] The plaintiff’s challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority finding that it had unjustifiably dismissed the defendant, Mrs...

8. [2007] NZEmpC AC 26/07 Eastern Equities Corp Ltd t/a Farmers Transport Ltd v Bright [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...CORPORATION LIMITED T/A FARMERS TRANSPORT LIMITED Plaintiff AND LEONARD EDWARD BRIGHT Defendant Hearing: 19-21 March 2007 (Heard at Gisborne) Appearances: T M Petherick, counsel for plaintiff D J Erickson, counsel for defendant Judgment: 16 May 2007 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS Introduction [1] This is a challenge and cross-challenge against a determination of the Employment Relations Authority at Auckland dated 21 December 2005. The determination fol...

9. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 Tikitere Trust [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 316 (2011 APPEAL 316) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...the order. This cannot be raised now, more than four years later. [39] The lower Court, in its decision of 10 September 2010, had no jurisdiction to set these orders aside and has not done so. [40] Even if the variations were set aside, in our judgement that would not alter the trustee‘s power to enter into the TPA. Clause 3(a) gave the trustees powers to enter into the agreement with no need to obtain variations to the trust order. [41] For the reasons given, this ground of ap...

10. Complaints Assessment Committee 413 v Marr [2019] NZREADT 008 [pdf, 334 KB]

    ...issue in this case is whether Ms Guttenbeil signed a sale and purchase agreement on 2 August, and whether Ms Marr forged, or otherwise knowingly used, a forged sale and purchase agreement dated 2 August 2013. It is therefore relevant to consider judgments of the High Court and Court of Appeal, in which the 2 August agreement was considered. We were referred to the judgments in caveat proceedings issued by Ms Marr, and Keith and Charlotte Marr, in the High Court,2 then appealed by...