Search Results

1. Chee v Stareast Investment Ltd [2010] NZWHT Auckland 33 [pdf, 298 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000091 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 33 BETWEEN JOSEPH CHEE and MARGARET CHEE Claimants AND STAREAST INVESTMENT LIMITED First Respondent AND MANUKAU CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND PATRICK HUNG Third Respondent AND T.Q. CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND BRIAN CHARLES TAYLOR Fifth Respondent AND SPOUTING AND STEEL ROOFING WORLD LIMITED Sixth Respondent AND RAYMOND PHILLIP BROCKL

2. [2018] NZEnvC 079 Maungaharuru Tangitu Trust v Hastings District Council [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Court: Environment Judge C J Thompson Alternate Environment Judge C L Fox Environment Commissioner W R Howie ENV-201S-WLG-OS4 Decision No [2018] NZEnvC 7 9 of an appeal under clause 14( 1) of the First Schedule to the Resource Management Act 1991 MAUNGAHARURU-TANGITO TRUST Appellant HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Hearing: at Hastings and Napier 6 - 8 March and 26 - 27 April

3. [2018] NZEnvC 046 Friends of Nelson Haven Tasman Bay Inc v Tasman District Council [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 0 4- b of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an inquiry under clauses 14(1) and 15(3) of Schedule 1 to the Act FRIENDS OF NELSON HAVEN AND TASMAN BAY INCORPORATED (ENV-2017 -WLG-00001 0) Appellant TASMAN DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent WAINUI SPAT CATCHING GROUP Applicant JILL/AN RUTH FOXWELL FRIENDS OF GOLDEN BAY SOCIETY (I NCORPORA

4. Environment Court Annual Review 2016 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   2016 Annual Review Calendar Year 2016 By Members of the Court Environment Court of New Zealand Annual Review 2016 2 PUBLISHED AUGUST 2017 CONCERNING CALENDAR YEAR 2016 In this review Calendar year 2016: an overview by Principal Environment Judge ............................................ 4 Profile of the Court ............................................................................................................................ 5 The Court’

5. Environment Court Annual Review 2016 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   2016 Annual Review Calendar Year 2016 By Members of the Court Environment Court of New Zealand Annual Review 2016 2 PUBLISHED AUGUST 2017 CONCERNING CALENDAR YEAR 2016 In this review Calendar year 2016: an overview by Principal Environment Judge ............................................ 4 Profile of the Court ............................................................................................................................ 5 The Court’

6. LCRO 239/2020 DP v FJ obo RK (25 June 2021) [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...view on the evidence before her. Nevertheless, as the Guidelines properly recognise, where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. 18 Deliu v Hong [2012] NZHC 158, [2012] NZAR 209 at [39]–[41]. 12 [59] More recently, the High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:19 A review by the LCRO is neither a...

7. OIA-117594.pdf [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 29 November 2024 Our ref: OIA 117564 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Powers of a bailiff Thank you for your emails of 2 and 15 November 2024, to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), in which you requested information under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), regarding powers of a bailiff. Specifically, you requested:

8. [2021] NZEnvC 062 Kombi Properties Limited (formerly HFT Limited) v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...comments were made in the context of a plan change, that had to "give effect to" the higher-order NZCPS. A question to be answered by the SC had also included whether the Board of Inquiry gave effect to the NZCPS in coming to a "balanced judgement" in the context of s67(3)(b). 20 [41] Notably, issues in that case related to the inter-relationship between the various objectives and policies in the NZCPS, and the reconciliation of the more relevant of these with Poli...

9. [2019] NZEmpC 54 Hong v Auckland Transport [pdf, 437 KB]

   ...YOON CHEOL HONG Plaintiff AND AUCKLAND TRANSPORT Defendant Hearing: 20-22 February 2019 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: M W Ryan, counsel for plaintiff C Parkhill and S L Fletcher, counsel for defendant Judgment: 10 May 2019 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN The defendant, Auckland Transport (AT), accepts that the plaintiff, Mr Hong, was unjustifiably dismissed by it from his position as a parking officer. The issues ar...

10. [2023] NZREADT 11 - CAC 2103 v Lieven (15 May 2023) [pdf, 263 KB]

    ...similar challenge was made in [Orlov v New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal7], where the Court, noting that s 239 was overlooked in Dorbu, held: “[80] We consider subs (1) [of s 239] governs s 50 of the Evidence Act 2006. The judgments may be accepted by the Disciplinary Tribunal as evidence. It then simply becomes a question of weight to be given to the conclusions contained therein. This assessment will inevitably be case specific and turn very much on the p...