Search Results

Search results for judgments on line.

2884 items matching your search terms

  1. [2021] NZACC 96 – Prater v ACC (6 July 2021) [pdf, 237 KB]

    ...Hearing: 30 March 2021 Supplementary Submissions Completed 26 May 2021 Heard at: Whangarei\Whangārei-Terenga-Parāoa Appearances: Ms Brock for the appellant Mr Mailand and Mr Tuiqereqere for the respondent Judgment: 6 July 2021 ____________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE DENESE HENARE [Funding for Surgery cl 2 Schedule 1; Weekly compensation s 103(2); and Suspension of entitlements s 1...

  2. [2021] NZACC 122 - Nelson v ACC (3 August 2021) [pdf, 229 KB]

    ...ACT BETWEEN SANTANA NELSON Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 14 July 2021 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikiriroa Appearances: F Taylor for the appellant F Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 3 August 2021 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for regained entitlement to weekly compensation following reassessment of vocational independence - ss 109 and 113, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1]...

  3. Sheleg v Accident Compensation Corporation (Cover for Mental Injury) [2025] NZACC 106 (3 July 2025) [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 27 June 2025 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented F Becroft for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 3 July 2025 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for mental injury - s 21B, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 27 September 2024....

  4. NZCASS Technical manual [pdf, 5.3 MB]

    Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information.

  6. [2023] NZEmpC 168 AJY v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 545 KB]

    AJY v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS [2023] NZEmpC 168 [3 October 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 168 EMPC 167/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN AJY Plaintiff AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Defendant EMPC 174/2022 IN THE MATTER

  7. CAC 10054 v Hume [2013] NZREADT 91 [pdf, 252 KB]

    ...misinterpreted. The defendant is scathing in his attitude to Mr W whom he regards as the cause and perpetrator of all these issues which he considers, arise over disputes between Mr W and the defendant over money. The defendant maintains that he has a Court judgment against Mr W for a substantial sum because commissions due to the defendant were not paid to him when he worked for Mr W. [33] The defendant seemed to be saying that his threatening and abusive telephone calls did not hap...

  8. [2020] NZIACDT 49 - HQT v Singh (19 November 2020) [pdf, 309 KB]

    ...regularly enforced by him. [73] According to Mr Singh, the open-plan office environment allows him to directly supervise all the staff. In liaising with clients, they are directed by him to ask for specific information. In this case, his considered judgement was employed to ensure the clerical work boundary was not overstepped. This is necessary to effectively and efficiently manage the business. He is always “vigilantly present” when interactions with clients happen, as w...

  9. 03.-Evidence-of-Mr-Dean-Wilson-Muaupoko-Tribal-Authority.PDF [PDF, 402 KB]

    ...Crown and private purchasers. The result was a breakdown of tribal unity, cohesion and land loss.5 46. The Court proceeded to award shares in block 11 to 81 Muaūpoko individuals. The partition of Horowhenua 11 began a few days after the Court’s judgment was handed down.6 4 D.A. Armstrong. Muaūpoko Origins, Rohe, Customary Interests and Sites of Significance Historyworks - August, 2021, Page 100-102. 5 D.A. Armstrong. Muaūpoko Origins, Rohe, Customary Interests and Sites of Signific...

  10. Bhana v Paniora - Wairau North 1B2C (2013) 69 Taitokerau 139 (69 TTK 139) [pdf, 155 KB]

    ...Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Wairau North 1B2C BETWEEN BARBARA BHANA Applicant AND REIHANA PANIORA and BULLA PANIORA Respondents Hearing: 22 February 2012 (Heard at Kaikohe) Judgment: 01 November 2013 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER 69 Taitokerau MB 140 Introduction [1] Barbara Bhana applies for an occupation order over part of Wairau North 1B2C. The area she se...