2844 items matching your search terms
T E U R E W E R A P A R T I I, V O L U M E 1 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I
...Court declined the remedies sought by the OA, but on appeal by the OA, the Court of Appeal unanimously 1 Pursuant to Court orders. 2 The Official Assignee v [VOI] Ltd [2015] NZHC 1416 [High Court judgment] at [7]. 3 reversed the High Court’s decision and declared that [VOI] was not entitled to cancel the agreement.3 Complaint [13] Mr BB lodged a complaint with the Lawyers Complaints Service on 25 October 2016. He sought...
...argued by various Māori landowner representatives, groups and individuals that there be no water conservation order. In 13 addition, we also consider whether and how any water conservation order could provide for Māori values in line with s 199(2)(b)(v) “historical, spiritual or cultural purposes” and (c) “outstanding significance in accordance with tikanga Maori”. [22] We also consider the report of the Special Tribunal and any draft water conservation order...
...February 2019 (Heard at Auckland) Court: Appearances: Judge B A Corkill Judge J C Holden Judge M E Perkins P Cranney, counsel for plaintiff M Beech, C Goodspeed and T Carlisle, counsel for defendant Judgment: 2 May 2019 JUDGMENT OF THE FULL COURT Introduction [1] At issue is whether Dr Timothy Mathews, a long-serving part-time employee of the Bay of Plenty District Health Board (the DHB), was contractually entitled to a...
...July 2009 238 Aotea MB 258, 19 August 2009 241 Aotea MB 3, 25 September 2009 Appearances: Messrs T Roberts & R Laurenson, for the applicants Mr G Paine for the First and Second Respondents Ms Verbison for Third and Fourth Respondents Judgment: 4 October 2010 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Solicitors: Kiely Thomson Caisley, Wellington for the Applicants John W Key, Fielding for the First and Second Respondents Fitzherbert Rowe, Palmerston North for the Thir...
...Police Conduct Authority Act 1988 (IPCA Act); that is, the absence of an explicit, unambiguous privative clause statutorily ousting the right to challenge actions and decisions of the Authority by way of judicial review. 2. The recent High Court judgment of Gault Jin Deliu v The Independent Police Conduct Authority1, dismissing the Authority's argument thats 33 of the IPCA Act is such a privative clause, has far reaching implications for the work of the Authority. Considering...
...Police Conduct Authority Act 1988 (IPCA Act); that is, the absence of an explicit, unambiguous privative clause statutorily ousting the right to challenge actions and decisions of the Authority by way of judicial review. 2. The recent High Court judgment of Gault Jin Deliu v The Independent Police Conduct Authority1, dismissing the Authority's argument thats 33 of the IPCA Act is such a privative clause, has far reaching implications for the work of the Authority. Considering...
REPORT FOR MINISTER OF JUSTICE ON COMPENSATION CLAIM BY TEINA ANTHONY PORA BY HON RODNEY HANSEN CNZM QC TABLE OF CONTENTS (1) INTRODUCTION ............................................................... " ....................................... 5 (2) A SHORT HISTORY .............................. ..... .......... .. .............. , ....................................... 7 (3) APPROACH TO APPLICATION ............................................ , ..........................
...Hearing: 13 August 2014 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: B Scotland and D Traylor, counsel for plaintiff L Blomfield, counsel for defendant S McKechnie, counsel for the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment Judgment: 20 August 2014 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 6) OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] This judgment decides the plaintiff’s application to enforce, by compliance order, an order made against the Ministry of Business, Innovation an...
...[28] Mr Franklin said that despite a final warning which it was acknowledged had expired, Mr Shanmuganathan’s behaviour had not changed and he continued to act in a manner that was not acceptable for a person in a management role. Lack of judgement in a leadership role needed to be addressed. It was his preliminary decision to require Mr Shanmuganathan to stand down from his System Control management role, and to operate as System Controller for at least 12 months. During tha...