Complaints Assessment Committee 408 v Reed [2017] NZREADT 6 [pdf, 226 KB]
...constitute misconduct? [51] We turn to consider the issue set out at [24][b], above. We note that in the light of our findings regarding the breaches of rr 10.2, 10.3, and 9.1, we are not required to consider the issue set out at [24][c]. [52] In its judgment in Barfoot & Thompson Ltd v Real Estate Agents Authority,7 the Court of Appeal summarised the obligations imposed by ss 134 and 135. Briefly paraphrased, the Court said: [a] The client’s consent is effective only if gi...