2882 items matching your search terms
i Regional Plan: Water for Otago Proposed Plan Change 8 (Discharge management) ISBN 978-0-908324-59-0 6 July 2020 CB0001 CB0002 Proposed Plan Change 8 (Discharge management) to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (6 July 2020) iii Introduction The Otago Regional Council has prepared Proposed Plan Change 8 (Discharge management) to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago. Proposed Plan Change 8 amends existing, a
...keep the client well informed of matters relevant to the client’s interest. 11 [48] A breach of any of these rules would, prima facie, result in a finding of unsatisfactory conduct under s.72(b) of the Act. Of course, it is a matter of judgment whether any of the rules have been breached. The Committee did not consider there was unsatisfactory conduct by the licensee. [49] If the appellant’s version of events is correct then, assuming the licensee properly understood...
...Arakelian. [2] Under the terms of the settlement agreement all settling parties agreed that the Council would engage Heaney & Co to pursue the claim against the DVK and Mr Arakelian on behalf of all the settling parties and attempt to obtain judgement for all parties for their losses and costs in connection with the claim. The original Page | 3 settlement agreement was subsequently renegotiated varying the contribution between the settling parties. This type of r...
...not object to Mr Tui appearing with the assistance of handwritten notes made by him at the review hearing. Mr Schmidt noted “I do not object to my friend appearing. It is convenient and we have worked together for a long time. So I trust his judgement in these issues. I cannot remember what the decision is but there was a recent High Court decision last year about counsel giving evidence and appearing on the same matter. And the very short version is that it is a matter of di...
...that the applicant had the support of a number of experienced persons in the industry. The Tribunal allowed the application for review, on the basis that the applicant’s licence would be subject to certain conditions. [27] We also refer to the judgment of his Honour Justice Nation in Real Estate Agents Authority v A, allowing the Registrar’s appeal against a decision of the Tribunal to reverse a decision not to renew the licence of a salesperson (“A”).5 In that case, A ha...
...that the applicant's proposed adaptive management plan and conditions were deficient. This was particularly in the sense that the proposed controls were:4 ... not objectively measurable and effectively delegate to independent experts the judgement as to whether or not the Proposal would be able to be fully developed beyond the first 10ha block. [9] The first interim decision also found this lack of certainty was aggravated by a choice of "amorphous words (e.g. 'minor...
...was a “mere” contravention of the Rules or mere negligence, sufficient to amount to unsatisfactory conduct.14 The defendant negligently withheld information which in fairness should have been provided to the purchasers. There was an error of judgement. [86] We do not though find the defendant’s non-disclosure to be seriously incompetent or negligent, or to amount to a marked and serious departure from the standards, as against a departure from the standards. It is not miscond...
...senior legal executive with some 26 years of experience who was well regarded by her colleagues and clients. They say:10 Ms MT was available to her to assist with any controversial issues which might require her help, and Ms HF had demonstrated her judgement in identifying those issues by seeking assistance in the past. The practitioners would normally meet with each other on a weekly basis to discuss their files in person; a practice which continued during the [City] Lockdown over Zoo...
...THE ACT BETWEEN PERATA ATUTAHI Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing date: 7 July 2025 Heard at: Wellington Appearances: Mr Remiens for the Appellant Ms Hansen for the Corporation Judgment: 17 September 2025 ___________________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF JUDGE JACQUI CLARK [Impairment Assessment Part 3 Schedule 1 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ___________________________...
...view on the evidence before her. Nevertheless, as the Guidelines properly recognise, where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. [28] The High Court has also described a review by the LCRO in the following way:4 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determination are ent...