Search Results

1. MENDOZA Carlos Frederick (CSU 2010 WHG 000185) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...have instituted in relation to supporting guidelines for the safe use of quad bikes; That riders must be trained and have the requisite experience to ride a quad bike in performing their duties and functions. 25 To ensure that proper judgement is exercised in choosing the right vehicle for the right job. To always wear a helmet. To prevent children riding adult quad bikes. [160] That a quad bike should not be referred to as all-terrain vehicle (ATV). It is accepte...

2. Jenkins v Matauri X Incorporation - Matauri X Incorporation (2005) 101 Whangārei MB 100 (101 WH 100) [pdf, 4.8 MB]

   ...immediate business difficullies. MB Ref: 101 WH 100·122 3 The hearing of the substantive issues resumed (following the 22 - 23 May 2003 hearing) on 07 July 2003. The Court was informed that Bridgecorp had filed an application for a Declaratory Judgement in the High Court, as to the validity of its mortgage security. At a hearing on 3 December 2003, the Interim Administrator reported that Bridgecorp's High Court application had been heard on 13 - 15 October 2003. He had i...

3. LCRO 211/2018 AB v CD (3 July 2019) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...view on the evidence before her. Nevertheless, as the Guidelines properly recognise, where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. [77] More recently, the High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:9 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determ...

4. Te Manutukutuku Issue 29 [pdf, 9 MB]

   ...set up in the 1860s to "Europeanise" land titles, so decisions could be made on who had the right to sell Maori land. It cites numerous examples which show that court decisions were neither uniform nor consistent, and says that "judgements only days apart could be radically different in both principle and outcome." Native Land Court judges decided who owned various tracts ofland. Once they had made a decision on ownership, cer­ tain named individuals were issu...

5. LCRO 8/2020 PA v ZN (21 December 2022) [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...in early 2014]. In June 2014, Mr GP was suspended from legal practice. I was his nominated attorney under his practice power of attorney. In late July 2014, Mr ZN turned up at my house on the last day for filing an appeal against a Family Court judgment, which had gone against him. Mr ZN told me that Mr GP was not responding to his communications and he could not find another lawyer to help and lodge the appeal. 8. I consider that I had a legal and professional obligation to assist...

6. Name suppression processes for victims of sexual violence [pdf, 493 KB]

   ...in certain circumstances. These exceptions are, however, all administered from a starting point that emphasises the importance of open justice and freedom of expression. Orders prohibiting publication of evidence, submissions or even a court’s judgment will also be made where that is necessary to protect prejudicial material from affecting the fairness of a trial. Those reasons generally disappear once a trial has concluded. Thereafter a strong onus lies on any person seeking to contin...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 226 Pirirakau Tribal Authority Incorporated v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...by HNZPT in s 49(2) are the same as those in s 59(1)(a) to which this Court must have regard when determining an appeal. The first matter listed in that provision is the historical and cultural heritage value of the archaeological site. In our judgment, such 24 HNZPT opening submissions at [6.3(b)]. 25 Greymouth Petroleum Ltd v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [2016] NZEnvC 11 at [43]. 19 values must be considered in their context, which may require wider consideration...

8. [2016] NZEmpC 111 MUNZ v The China Navigation Co Pte Ltd [pdf, 505 KB]

   ...CHINA NAVIGATION COMPANY PTE. LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 16 and 17 August 2016 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: SR Mitchell, counsel, and J Lynch, advocate, for plaintiffs S Langton and R Tomkinson, counsel for defendant Judgment: 22 August 2016 Reasons: 29 August 2016 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN INDEX Background ……………………………………………………………………........ [2] Plaint...

9. Nga Runanga EiC S McIntyre Planning Amended tracked 17 Feb 2021 [PDF, 1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND TE RŪNANGA O MOERAKI, KĀTI HUIRAPA RŪNAKA K

10. Nga Runanga EiC S McIntyre Planning Amended 17 Feb 2021 [PDF, 1 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND TE RŪNANGA O MOERAKI, KĀTI HUIRAPA RŪNAKA K