2882 items matching your search terms
AIR NZ LTD V WULFF AK 6 December 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2010] NZEMPC 158 ARC 101/09 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND RANDALL WULFF Defendant Hearing: 22-25 March 2010 (4 days) (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Kevin Thompson, counsel for the plaintiff Paul Wicks and Lisa Keys, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 6 December 2010
CLAIM NO: 01086 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN RUSSELL WILLIAM TIDMARSH and JOY ISABELLE TIDMARSH Claimants AND JOHN GLOVER First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 5 December 2005 Appearances: Russell Tidmarsh and Christopher Twigley for the Claimants John Glover, the First Respondent in person Jeremy Atkinson for the Second Respondent Raymon
...implications, I acknowledge that the lawyers were corresponding with each other in considerable haste and apparent tension against a background of historical conflict between Company B’s directors. Clarity and precision, as well as professional judgement, can suffer in such circumstances. 18 The Complaint [88] In their complaint, Mr PK and Mr OJ alleged a breach or breaches by Mr BW of r 6.1 of the Rules, which provides as follows: A lawyer must not act for more than 1 client on...
...Application to the Chief Judge BETWEEN RIPEKA TE HERE WHAREKAI WHITU KITTY RURU (TE NGARURU) BRIGHTWELL Applicant Hearing: 6 November 2019, 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1370 – 1396 (Heard at Whanganui) Judgment: 23 December 2019 RESERVED DECISION OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1458 Introduction [1] Ripeka te Here Wharekai Whiti Kitty Ruru (te Ngaruru) Brightwell...
...TAUWHAO-TE NGARE TRUST Applicant AND DONALD SHAW Respondent Hearing: 24 March 2009 at 137 Waikato MB 119-127 15 May 2009 at 98 Tauranga MB 175 16 June 2009 at 99 Tauranga MB 72-184 9 February 2012 at 2012 Chief Judge's MB 83-84 Judgment: 9 August 2013 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2013 Chief Judge’s MB 568 Introduction [1] This application filed by William Gardiner on behalf of the Trustees of Tauwhao-Te Ngare Trust (the applicant) pursuant to s...
...Heard at Whangārei Appearances: Ms Carolyn Cameron, for the applicants Mr Wayne Coutts, for the first respondent Mr Murray Tingey, for the second respondent Judgment: 13 November 2015 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M J DOOGAN Copies to: Carolyn Cameron, Burton & Co Lawyers, PO Box 8889 Symonds Street Auckland 1150, cac@burtonco.co.nz Wayne Coutts, Thomson Wils...
...9 Deliu v Hong [2012] NZHC 158, [2012] NZAR 209 at [39]–[41]. 7 where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. [26] More recently, the High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:10 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determina...
...SATEND PRASAD Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 9 September 2024 Written Submissions: 12 and 16 September 2024 Appearances: M Edison for the appellant F Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 18 November 2024 ___________________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE AA SINCLAIR [Work Related Gradual Process Injury: s 30 Accident Compensation Act 2001] _______________...
...Kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing 18 December 2024, 2025 Chief Judge’s MB 455-479 (Heard at Wellington via zoom) Kanohi kitea: Appearances L Watson for the Applicant A Samuels and A Piwari in person Whakataunga: Judgment date 3 April 2025 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ MATUA C L FOX Judgment of Chief Judge C L Fox 2025 Chief Judge's MB 729 Hei timatanga kōrero Introduction [1]...
...Family Court proceedings disclosure of the information assisted her positively by confirming that she personally, not the trust, was an original purchaser for Rosetta Road, thus enabling the Court to make a positive finding in her favour. See the judgment of Judge Grace at paras [18] to [20] in his decision of 31 July 20144. [78] Absent the element of adverse affect, the Tribunal finds that the respondent has not breached rule 8.7 of the rules of 2008. [79] Before reaching that c...