Search Results

1. Brooking v Henderson - Wharekahika A47 (2022) 110 Tairawhiti MB 238 (110 TRW 238) [pdf, 497 KB]

   110 Tairawhiti MB 238 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAIRĀWHITI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tairāwhiti District A20190011094 WĀHANGA Under Section 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Wharekahika A47 I WAENGA I A Between ASHLEY BROOKING Te kaitono Applicant ME And APIRANA MAPUROA HENDERSON Te kaiurupare Respondent Nohoanga: Hearing 31 January 2020,

2. NZCVS Methodology Report Cycle 1 (2018) [pdf, 5 MB]

   Methodology Report Cycle 1 (2018) Published in May 2019 By The Ministry of Justice Justice Centre, 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088, Wellington, New Zealand ISSN:2744-5798 Suggested citation Ministry of Justice. 2019. New Zealand Crime and Victims Survey. Methodology Report. Cycle 1 (2018). Wellington: Ministry of Justice. https://www.justice.govt

3. [2014] NZEmpC 157 Howard v Carter Holt Harvey Packing Ltd [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...CARTER HOLT HARVEY PACKAGING LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 28 - 30 July 2014 (heard at Christchurch) Appearances: D Beck, R Boulton and D Mills-Godinet, counsel for the plaintiff D France and J Greenleaf, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 29 August 2014 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] Mr Dean Howard has challenged a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority), which found that his employer, Carter Holt Harv...

4. Harland v ACC [2014] NZACA 13 [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...the child cannot be left alone because of injury related factors such as the risk of seizures, fitting, stopping breathing, harm to self or to others, then this must be reflected in the provision of attendant care.”(pg. 56) • My professional judgment related to expected developmental milestones was applied to Grace’s original report. This was a combination of my experience as a paediatric therapist and reference to standardised Developmental assessment tools. 8 At tha...

5. LCRO 194/2017 MA v NB, OC and PD (20 September 2019) [pdf, 344 KB]

   LCRO 194/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area]l Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN MA Applicant AND NB, OC and PD Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Dr MA has applied to review a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] to take no fur

6. LCRO 80/2021 A LN and B LN v QG (9 November 2021) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...final invoice. Unforeseeable issues affecting health and the ability to manage a law practice are examples of this. [108] That being said, as a matter of fairness some allowance could be made for the impact on Ms QG of receiving the court’s judgement in her litigation. However, Ms QG said that the judgment was not issued until 21 February 2020.19 [109] Nevertheless, Ms QG has not provided any compelling reason to explain why she could not have issued Mr LN with a final invoice...

7. LCRO 40/2021 PT v UT and RL t/a Law Firm A (28 April 2022) [pdf, 266 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 034 Ref: LCRO 40/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN PT Applicant AND UT and RL t/a [LAW FIRM A] Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Intr

8. [2023] NZEmpC 221 Cronin-Lampe v The Board of Trustees of Melville High School [pdf, 1 MB]

   KATHLEEN CRONIN-LAMPE v THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MELVILLE HIGH SCHOOL [2023] NZEmpC 221 [5 December 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 221 ARC 55/2013 ARC 79/2013 ARC 48/2014 ARC 25/2014 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND

9. CBA v LKJ Ltd [2014] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 205 KB]

   1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANT AND EMPLOYEES OF THE DEFENDANT (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 13 Reference No. HRRT 034/2011 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN CBA PLAINTIFF AND LKJ LIMITED DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr R

10. [2013] NZEmpC 155 Clark v Idea Services Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

    WILLIAM STUART CLARK v IDEA SERVICES LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 155 [16 August 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 155 CRC 22/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN WILLIAM STUART CLARK Plaintiff AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 27-29 June 2011 (Heard at Invercargill) Appearances: Damien Pine and Jessie