Search Results

Search results for judgments on line.

2843 items matching your search terms

  1. Waitangi Tribunal - Part III Te Urewera [pdf, 6.7 MB]

    T E U R E W E R A P A R T I I I Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 2 W A I 8 9 4 T E U R E W E R A P r e - p u b l i c a t i o n P a r t I I I From self-governing native res

  2. [2020] NZEnvC 153 Cabra Rural Developments Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 3 MB]

    ...the High Court appeal. [3] By Decision issued on 6th August, Gordon J2 issued a decision allowing the appeal in part on the first alleged error law (Issues 1 and 3) and the second and fifth alleged errors of law (paragraph 262 of the High Court Judgment sets these out in more detail). They were (paraphrased): i) The Environment Court failed to take into account and properly apply mandatory considerations under the RMA by: (a) Failing to give effect to Policy 13 and Policy 15 of th...

  3. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 Lake Block (2020) 415 Aotea MB 1 (415 AOT 1) [pdf, 720 KB]

    ...Hearing 19 July 2018, 388 Aotea MB 128-135, 136-144 4-6 March 2019, 398 Aotea MB 1-243 6 March 2019, 398 Aotea MB 244-250 9 May 2019, 401 Aotea MB 9-34 (Heard at Levin and Rotorua) Kanohi kitea: Appearances Whakataunga: Judgment L Watson for P Taueki L Thornton for C Rudd M McKechnie and L Underhill Sem for Former Trustees G Baumann for Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga 11 May 2020 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ L R HARVEY

  4. Case studies from evaluation of court-referred restorative justice pilot [pdf, 791 KB]

    Evaluation of the Court-Referred Restorative Justice Pilot: Case Studies Prepared by the Crime and Justice Research Centre Victoria University of Wellington May 2005 2 DISCLAIMER This research was commissioned by the former Department for Courts. The report has been prepared by the authors and the views expressed in it are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the

  5. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Crampton [2015] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 151 KB]

    ...irrecoverably damaged. Many people assumed the content of the written warning was true because of its official-seeming nature and its publication by the media. As a distance student representative her constituents could only read about her and make their judgment about her competence and service delivery based on what was in the media. There were about 17,000 students off-campus studying from a distance and they would only know about Ms Chapman from what they read. A deluge of emails f...

  6. LCRO 164/2014 WN and JM v SG [pdf, 352 KB]

    ...10 evidence before her. Nevertheless, as the Guidelines properly recognise, where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. [47] More recently, the High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:6 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determinatio...

  7. [2021] NZACC 74 - Brown v ACC (17 May 2021) [pdf, 350 KB]

    ...BETWEEN LOUISE BROWN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 17 February 2021 Appearances: Ms B Peck and Ms Copeland for the Appellant Mr O Gascoigne for the Respondent Judgment: 17 May 2021 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P A CUNNINGHAM Introduction [1] In a letter dated 27 November 2018, the respondent declined a request for back surgery to the 5th lumbar/1st sacral vertebral disc made by Ms Brow...

  8. Rankin v Accident Compensation Corporation (Revocation of Cover Mental Injury) [2023] NZACC 96 [pdf, 389 KB]

    ...BETWEEN MELISSA RANKIN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 12 and 13 June 2023 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikirioa Appearances: Ms K Koloni for the Appellant S Churstain for the Respondent Judgment: 20 June 2023 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Revocation of cover - s 65; mental injury – s 26, suspension of entitlements – s 117, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”] Introduction [1] This is an appea...

  9. Nikora v Trustees of the Tūhoe - Te Uru Taumatua Trust [2025] Māori Appellate Court MB 192 (2025 APPEAL 192) [pdf, 370 KB]

    ...February 2025, 2025 Māori Appellate Court MB 53-83 (Heard at Rotorua) Kooti: Court Judge M J Doogan (Presiding) Judge D H Stone Judge A M Thomas Kanohi kitea: Appearances M van Alphen Fyfe for Respondents Whakataunga: Judgment date 5 May 2025 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā TE KOOTI Reserved Judgment of the Court 2025 Māori Appellate Court MB 193 Kōrero tīmatanga Introduction Kōrero tīmatanga Introduction...

  10. Tamehana - Ngongohau No.6 (2025) 508 Aotea MB 149 (508 AOT 149) [pdf, 471 KB]

    ...MB 1-97 2 April 2025, 507 Aotea MB 165-206 (Heard at Whanganui) Kanohi kitea: Appearances S Sadd for Te Paku o Te Rangi Marae Charitable Trust T Wano for Ms Bailey and Ms Takarangi M McGhie for Tūmango Whānau Whakataunga: Judgment date 23 July 2025 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ A M THOMAS Judgment of Judge A M Thomas Ka haere tonu ngā taipitopito kēhi i muri ake nei Proceedings continue overleaf...