2882 items matching your search terms
...BETWEEN H Plaintiff AND A Ltd Defendant Hearing: 13, 14 and 15 August 2014 (heard at Auckland) Appearances: R Harrison QC and C Abaffy, counsel for the plaintiff P Caisley, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 7 October 2014 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Index Introduction …………………………………………………………………………... [1] Factual Summary ………………………………………...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B
1 Full Report Victim-Offender Overlap: Investigating the Relationship between Victimisation and Perpetration of Violence in Aotearoa Report Date: 31 January 2025 Report Authors: Dr. Clare-Ann Fortune, A/Prof. Steven J Bowe and Dr. Roxy Heffernan Research Team: Jason Northover and Elia Gibbons Project Funder: Ministry of Justice, New Zealand 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was commissioned and supported by the Contestable Research Fund from Mi
1063 OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL v NGA RUNANGA Ors NOE ENV CROMWELL 2021 NOE (1) 20210510 COURT RESUMES ON MONDAY 10 MAY 2021 AT 3.00 PM SITE VISIT – NO EVIDENCE CALLED 5 1064 OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL v NGA RUNANGA Ors NOE ENV CROMWELL 2021 NOE (1) 20210510 COURT RESUMES ON TUESDAY 11 MAY 2021 AT 9.34 AM THE COURT: JUDGE BORTHWICK Good morning Ms Mehlhopt for the Regional Council. Mr Page, who are you for? I know you’ve put OWRUG. Anybody else because
...cases involving information claimed to risk national security if disclosed, although infrequent, continue to highlight the gaps and uncertainties in the law, with strongly contested procedures and interim findings.5 The processes adopted and interim judgments in those cases have been considered in developing the proposals I am putting forward. Recent cases provide helpful insight into the practicalities of balancing the protection of NSI with non-Crown parties’ interests. They also provide im...
...Intelligence Unit (FIU). However, the information that is reported can be limited due to the subjective and disparate nature of reports that are based on suspicion. This can be a problem because they are: 82.1. subjective – they are based on judgements made by reporting entities so suspicious transactions have the potential to go unnoticed, and secondly, a single report excludes a large set of supporting information; and 13 82.2. disparate – they are based on a reporting en...
...made at 108 Aotea MB 247-248 on 1 October 2011 BETWEEN CYRUS GREGORY TAUAHIKA HINGSTON Applicant AND STANLEY BERNARD ERUINI HIROTI Respondent Hearing: 17 June 2016, 143 Waiāriki MB 130-159 (Heard at Rotorua) Judgment: 27 July 2016 RESERVED DECISION OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 673 Introduction [1] This application filed by Cyrus Hingston (the applicant) pursuan...