2843 items matching your search terms
...HAIR & SKIN Plaintiff AND SHANNEN BROWN Defendant Hearing: 4, 5, 6, 17 March and 1 April 2015 (heard at Nelson) Appearances: T Stallard, counsel for the plaintiffs A Sharma, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 28 May 2015 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] In November 2010, Ms Brown commenced work as an apprentice hairdresser at Untouchable Hair & Beauty operated by Mr and Mrs Adams. Ms Brown had just le...
...amendment Bill. Key Limitations or Constraints on Analysis Likely conscience issues for members of Parliament Officials’ role in providing advice on conscience issues is limited • All policy decisions involve applying ethical and value-based judgments. These values are normally reflected through the objectives section of a regulatory impact statement, with the objectives typically set by the Government. • There is no Government policy position on changing abortion law. Th...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 154 Ref: LCRO 47/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN BQ Applicant AND ZG Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The applicant, Mr BQ
, ~. , .. ~ 11 RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT 8 THE ALIENATION OF MAORI LAND IN THE ROHE POTAE (AOTEA BLOCK) PART 2: 1900 - 1960 CATHY MARR AUGUST 1999 WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES List of Contents f ' Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. ill , ' Introduction •.••••••••.•.......•.•.....••...••..•.•..•.....•...•.•
...the view from the property. He should have known 20 that it was vital that the development plan be disclosed to [the purchasers] before they purchased the property. We can only regard the defendant's failure as such a bad error of judgement as to be very negligent, if not deliberate. (Emphasis added). [70] We found misconduct proved, both on the basis of disgraceful conduct and seriously negligent real estate agency work. [71] The Authority submits that, viewed in...
...explained by the High Court in the Titirangi case, this hypothetical person must be taken as having a reasonable knowledge of the manner in which designations operate7 and also how the designated activity would generally be undertaken.8 [47] In our judgment, we also think that the same point of view of the hypothetical ordinary reasonable person should be adopted in terms of considering any effect that the conditions of the designation address, rather than the point of view of the r...
...Further, judicial review actions of decisions made by the UK CCRC and the Scottish CCRC have been rare. Decisions from judicial review cases against the CCRCs in both Scotland and the UK have emphasised that the courts are hesitant to override the CCRC judgement on a case.23 Even if the court objects to a decision to not refer a case by the CCRC on the merits, they have tended to rule on whether the decision was legally tenable and, if not, that the CCRC should reconsider the case. Legal...
...who have worked with him will know, a Judge who is dedicated to the work of the Court and Tribunal, to the betterment of Māori land and Māori landowners, and above all else committed to ngā iwi Māori. This has informed his many written Court judgments where he has advanced the law in relation to Māori land, his guidance and rulings in Court and Tribunal sittings, and the work he has continued to undertake on trust boards and as a lecturer alongside his role in the Court and Tr...
...estoppel arise and in the modern formulation it is certainly the most important criteria.11 However, there still needs to be an action or omission for a party to be estopped. From Goldstar v Gaunt;12 It nevertheless remains clear that before judgment can be given against a defendant on the grounds of estoppel, some action, or representation, or omission to act, must have been carried out by, or on behalf of, that defendant causing the plaintiff to have acted in a manner causing l...
Applying to be a legal aid provider Step-by-step guide Ministry of Justice May 2024 Introduction This guide will help you complete an application to become an approved provider of legal aid services or specified legal services under section 77 of the Legal Services Act 2011 (Act). The guide explains some of the terms used in the forms and includes a checklist to help you ensure your application is complete. Before you can provide legal aid services or specified legal ser