Search Results

1. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 Lake Block (2020) 415 Aotea MB 1 (415 AOT 1) [pdf, 720 KB]

   ...Hearing 19 July 2018, 388 Aotea MB 128-135, 136-144 4-6 March 2019, 398 Aotea MB 1-243 6 March 2019, 398 Aotea MB 244-250 9 May 2019, 401 Aotea MB 9-34 (Heard at Levin and Rotorua) Kanohi kitea: Appearances Whakataunga: Judgment L Watson for P Taueki L Thornton for C Rudd M McKechnie and L Underhill Sem for Former Trustees G Baumann for Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga 11 May 2020 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ L R HARVEY

2. Waitangi Tribunal - Part 2 The alienation of Māori land in Rohe Potae [pdf, 5.9 MB]

   , ~. , .. ~ 11 RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT 8 THE ALIENATION OF MAORI LAND IN THE ROHE POTAE (AOTEA BLOCK) PART 2: 1900 - 1960 CATHY MARR AUGUST 1999 WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES List of Contents f ' Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. ill , ' Introduction •.••••••••.•.......•.•.....••...••..•.•..•.....•...•.•

3. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Crampton [2015] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...irrecoverably damaged. Many people assumed the content of the written warning was true because of its official-seeming nature and its publication by the media. As a distance student representative her constituents could only read about her and make their judgment about her competence and service delivery based on what was in the media. There were about 17,000 students off-campus studying from a distance and they would only know about Ms Chapman from what they read. A deluge of emails f...

4. LCRO 164/2014 WN and JM v SG [pdf, 352 KB]

   ...10 evidence before her. Nevertheless, as the Guidelines properly recognise, where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. [47] More recently, the High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:6 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determinatio...

5. [2021] NZACC 74 - Brown v ACC (17 May 2021) [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...BETWEEN LOUISE BROWN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 17 February 2021 Appearances: Ms B Peck and Ms Copeland for the Appellant Mr O Gascoigne for the Respondent Judgment: 17 May 2021 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P A CUNNINGHAM Introduction [1] In a letter dated 27 November 2018, the respondent declined a request for back surgery to the 5th lumbar/1st sacral vertebral disc made by Ms Brow...

6. Rankin v Accident Compensation Corporation (Revocation of Cover Mental Injury) [2023] NZACC 96 [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...BETWEEN MELISSA RANKIN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 12 and 13 June 2023 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikirioa Appearances: Ms K Koloni for the Appellant S Churstain for the Respondent Judgment: 20 June 2023 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Revocation of cover - s 65; mental injury – s 26, suspension of entitlements – s 117, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”] Introduction [1] This is an appea...

7. Nikora v Trustees of the Tūhoe - Te Uru Taumatua Trust [2025] Māori Appellate Court MB 192 (2025 APPEAL 192) [pdf, 370 KB]

   ...February 2025, 2025 Māori Appellate Court MB 53-83 (Heard at Rotorua) Kooti: Court Judge M J Doogan (Presiding) Judge D H Stone Judge A M Thomas Kanohi kitea: Appearances M van Alphen Fyfe for Respondents Whakataunga: Judgment date 5 May 2025 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā TE KOOTI Reserved Judgment of the Court 2025 Māori Appellate Court MB 193 Kōrero tīmatanga Introduction Kōrero tīmatanga Introduction...

8. Tamehana - Ngongohau No.6 (2025) 508 Aotea MB 149 (508 AOT 149) [pdf, 471 KB]

   ...MB 1-97 2 April 2025, 507 Aotea MB 165-206 (Heard at Whanganui) Kanohi kitea: Appearances S Sadd for Te Paku o Te Rangi Marae Charitable Trust T Wano for Ms Bailey and Ms Takarangi M McGhie for Tūmango Whānau Whakataunga: Judgment date 23 July 2025 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ A M THOMAS Judgment of Judge A M Thomas Ka haere tonu ngā taipitopito kēhi i muri ake nei Proceedings continue overleaf...

9. Morgan v CAC 20003 [2014] NZREADT 14 [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...the view from the property. He should have known 20 that it was vital that the development plan be disclosed to [the purchasers] before they purchased the property. We can only regard the defendant's failure as such a bad error of judgement as to be very negligent, if not deliberate. (Emphasis added). [70] We found misconduct proved, both on the basis of disgraceful conduct and seriously negligent real estate agency work. [71] The Authority submits that, viewed in...

10. [2019] NZEnvC 154 NEIL Construction Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 4.4 MB]

    ...explained by the High Court in the Titirangi case, this hypothetical person must be taken as having a reasonable knowledge of the manner in which designations operate7 and also how the designated activity would generally be undertaken.8 [47] In our judgment, we also think that the same point of view of the hypothetical ordinary reasonable person should be adopted in terms of considering any effect that the conditions of the designation address, rather than the point of view of the r...