Search Results

Search results for judgments on line.

2842 items matching your search terms

  1. Wellington Standards Committee v Hall [2014] NZLCDT 1 [pdf, 263 KB]

    NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZLCDT 1 LCDT 015/11 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the Law Practitioners Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER OF DONNA MARIE TAI TOKERAU DURIE HALL of Wellington, Solicitor CHAIR Mr D Mackenzie MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr W Chapman Mr S Maling Mr W Smith Ms P Walker HEARING at Welli

  2. Morgan v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 20003) NZREADT 82 [pdf, 331 KB]

    ...although the provisions of s.73 assist to an extent in defining the scope of s.72. Substantially less will be required to establish unsatisfactory conduct than will be required to establish misconduct. Beyond that, the words in s.72 should not, in my judgment be over-refined by treating the words in s.72 on the basis that they have some technical meaning or by seeking synonyms for words which have natural meaning.” [57] Mr Clancy submits for the prosecution that what must be proved...

  3. Dotcom v Crown Law Office [2018] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 944 KB]

    1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF ALL INFORMATION RELATING TO PLAINTIFF’S MEDICAL CIRCUMSTANCES (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 7 Reference No. HRRT 047/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN KIM DOTCOM Plaintiff AND CROWN LAW OFFICE First Defendant CONT. AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG

  4. Recommendations recap - issue 8 [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    1 2 Coroners have a duty to identify any lessons learned from the deaths referred to them that might help prevent similar deaths happening in the future. In order to publicise these lessons, the findings and recommendations of most cases are open to the public. Recommendations Recap identifies and gives web links to summaries of all coronial recommendations that have been made over the relevant period. We also include any summaries of respons

  5. Final Submissions Summary Report [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    Crown/Māori Relations Summary of Submissions Te ara whakamua ā tātou Our path ahead Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully exclude

  6. 2021-07-07 ORC - Closing Submissions [pdf, 422 KB]

    IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-2020-CHC-127 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER of the Water Permits Plan Change - Plan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an application under section 149T of the RMA BET

  7. [2019] NZEmpC 34 Emmerson v Northland District Health Board [pdf, 908 KB]

    LYNDA MARIE EMMERSON v NORTHLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD [2019] NZEmpC 34 [28 March 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 34 EMPC 278/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN LYNDA MARIE EMMERSON Plaintiff AND NORTHLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: 1, 3, 5, 15, 16, 1

  8. Horowhenua: The Muaūpoko Priority Report [pdf, 8.4 MB]

    H O R O W H E N U A Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 7 W A I 2 2 0 0 H O R O W H E N U A The M uaūpoko Priority Report P r

  9. Allen + Clarke FV Courts Evaluation Final Report [pdf, 2 MB]

    Evaluation of Family Violence Courts Final Report 5 March 2021 Family Violence Courts Evaluation – Final Report 2 About Allen + Clarke Allen and Clarke Policy and Regulatory Specialists Limited (Allen + Clarke) is a consultancy firm with offices in based in Wellington (New Zealand) and Melbourne (Australia). We specialise in policy and programme development and implementation, research and evaluation

  10. Fehling v South Westland Area School [2012] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 144 KB]

    ...established as more likely to eventuate than not would be unreal. It must be enough if there is a serious or real and substantial risk to a protected interest, a risk that might well eventuate … Whether such a risk exists must be largely a matter of judgment … [Emphasis added] [68] This passage has been applied by the Tribunal on a number of occasions. See for example Te Koeti v Otago District Health Board [2009] NZHRRT 24, Kaiser v Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry [2009] NZH...