Search Results

1. Cao v Tony Tay and Associates Ltd (in liq) [2010] NZWHT Auckland 26 [pdf, 270 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000119 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 26 BETWEEN HAI CAO and YANMING TAO Claimants AND TONY TAY AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED (In Liquidation) First Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND BRIAN WILLIAM NEWTH Third Respondent AND ALLAN CHRISTINI (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND TONY MENG HIANG TAY Fifth Respondent AND SELINA SIAW NYUNAK TAY Sixth Respondent AND JOHN WATTS TRAD

2. NZCASS: estimating the costs of crime in 2003/04 New Zealand [pdf, 150 KB]

   Estimating the costs of crime in New Zealand in 2003/04 Tim Roper Andrew Thompson N E W Z E A L A N D T R E A S U R Y W O R K I N G P A P E R 0 6 / 0 4 J U L Y 2 0 0 6 N Z T R E A S U R Y W O R K I N G P A P E R 0 6 / 0 4 Estimating the costs of crime in New Zealand in 2003/04 M O N T H / Y E A R July 2006 A U T H O R S Tim Roper The Treasury PO Box 3724 Wellington New Zealand Email Telephone Fax tim.roper@treasury.govt.nz +64 4 917

3. Landpro - EiC - C E Bright - Hydrology (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 275 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY UNDER Resource Management Act 1991 (Act). IN THE MATTER OF The Water Permits Plan Change - Plan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF CHRISTINA ELYSE BRIGHT ON BEHALF OF LANDPRO LIMITED 5 February 2021

4. Mr-Rasheeds-Submissions-of-37-Families.pdf [pdf, 619 KB]

   IN THE CORONER’S COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI KAITIROTIRO MATEWHAWHATI KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU CSU-2019-CCH-000165 to CSU-2019-CCH-000214; CSU-2019-CCH-000326 UNDER The Coroners Act 2006 AND IN THE MATTER OF An inquiry into the deaths of 51 people in relation to the 15 March 2019 Christchurch Masjid attacks __________________________________________________________________ SUBMISSIONS OF COUNSEL FOR 37 INTERESTED PARTIES Dated: 8 Februa

5. [2023] NZEnvC 045 Gray v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 527 KB]

   GRAY & SINCLAIR-GRAY v DCC – DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 45 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN G S GRAY AND K M SINCLAIR- GRAY (ENV-2022-CHC-024) Appellants AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Environment Commissioner S Myers Hearing: at Dunedin on 14 December 2022 Appearance

6. LCRO 3/2024 RP v TG (21 May 2024) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...view on the evidence before her. Nevertheless, as the Guidelines properly recognise, where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. [83] More recently, the High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:4 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determi...

7. 20240930-Sentencing-Reform-Proactive-Release-2nd-Tranche_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 8.7 MB]

   ...inconvenience for v ictims and witnesses. The full list of proposed considerations is set out in appendix 1. This approach is consistent with the use of sliding scales for guilty pleas in other jurisd ictions,6 and has drawn from New Zealand guideline judgments. 11. We seek your agreement to include these factors in the Bill and instruct PCO accordingly. 3 Where a defendant has pleaded not guilty, a case review hearing takes place before trial. This is where the defendant confirms wheth...

8. LCRO 109/2024 BD and GD v RJ (19 September 2025) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...view on the evidence before her. Nevertheless, as the Guidelines properly recognise, where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. [45] The High Court has also described a review under the Act in the following way:9 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determination are...

9. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (HDC Act) [2020] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 434 KB]

   IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 9 Reference No. HRRT 041/2018 UNDER THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN EAMON HENNING MARSHALL PLAINTIFF AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED DEFENDANT AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia JP, Member Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr GW Marshall as agent for his son Ms I Reuv

10. Evaluation of Family Safety Teams pilot: stage 1 [pdf, 3 MB]

    Family Safety Teams Pilot Evaluation: Stage One Baseline Study and Formative Evaluation A report prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Robyn Dixon & Deborah Widdowson Centre for Child and Family Policy Research Janet Fanslow & David Thomas Social and Community Health School of Population Health University of Auckland Trish Knaggs, Latika Vasil, Esther Banbury Ministry of Justice 31 August 2006 2