2843 items matching your search terms
...for further and better disclosure BETWEEN S Plaintiff AND L Defendant Hearing: By submissions made on 3 and 11 February 2014 Appearances: Y, advocate for plaintiff Emily McWatt, counsel for defendant Judgment: 13 February 2014 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] This proceeding is a challenge to the determination 1 of the Employment Relations Authority refusing interim reinstatement in employment pending...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act PETER, JILLIAN AND SIMON BEADLE (ENV-2018-CHC-156) Appellants QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner W R Howie Environment Commissioner G Paine Hearing: at Queenstown on 13 December 2018 Appeara
...BROADSPECTRUM (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED (FORMERLY TRANSFIELD SERVICES (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers 3, 4, 9 and 10 August 2017 Appearances: T Cleary, counsel for plaintiff R Upton, counsel for defendant Judgment: 25 August 2017 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE K G SMITH [1] Broadspectrum (NZ) Ltd has applied for a stay of proceedings or of execution of a decision in the judgment of Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd issued...
...1 Complaints Assessment Committee 10024 v Downtown Apartments Ltd (In Liq) [2010] NZREADT 6, at [55]. [12] In considering the charge against the defendant, the Tribunal refers to the discussion of disgraceful conduct in the judgment of Woodhouse J in Morton-Jones v Real Estate Agents Authority, in particular, his Honour’s discussion of s 73(a) of the Act.2 His Honour said:3 [29] … If the charge is under s 73(a) the critical enquiry is whether the conduct...
...Respondent (Removed) AND LAI FOOK CHOY Fourth Respondent (Not Served) FINAL DETERMINATION DATED 28 AUGUST 2024 2 Introduction [1] The claimants sue the second respondent, Alistair John Couper, seeking judgment for the outstanding balance of the assessed repair costs of their home following their participation in the Financial Assistance Package scheme (FAP). [2] The claimants seek the sum of $367,975.20, being the balance remaining fr...
...CONNOR ISABELLA MEHANA KENNETH CONNOR NGAIRE COOPER Applicants Hearing: 29 August 2006 22 December 2006 26 September 2007 14 December 2010 7 March 2011 (Heard at Whangarei) Court: Judge A D Spencer Judge D J Ambler Judgment: 12 April 2011 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGES A D SPENCER AND D J AMBLER Introduction [1] This judgment concerns five applications for occupation orders under s 328 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (―the Act‖). Barry Gough...
...COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 30 May 2025 Held at: Wellington/Te Whanganui-a-Tara by AVL Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented F Becroft for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 4 June 2025 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Interpretation of decision – s 6, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 4 Februar...
...15948 I WAENGA I A Between ALVINA JANE SCIASCIA-BIZAOUI Te kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 2 September 2024, 113 Tākitimu MB 134-146 4 November 2024, 113 Tākitimu MB 299-304 (Heard at Hastings) Whakataunga: Judgment date 13 November 2024 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ D H STONE Judgment of Judge D H Stone 114 Tākitimu MB 2 Kōrero tīmatanga Introduction [1] The applicant, Alvina Sc...
...(HATA) KAIPARA Plaintiff AND CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 16 April and 24 May 2012 Appearances: Stan Austin, advocate for plaintiff Daniel Erickson, counsel for defendant Judgment: 13 June 2012 COSTS JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] The successful defendant (CHH) seeks an order for contribution to its costs following the Court’s judgment of 5 March 2012 1 dismissing the plaintiff’s challe...
...project manager and Maincom New Zealand Ltd was selected as the builder. A building contract was signed on 13 August 2013, and work began soon after. [6] It is fair to say that the repair process was problematic. As has been noted in several judgments of this Tribunal, in the aftermath of the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence the construction industry was stretched to and beyond its capacity. Overstretched and under supervised tradesmen, whose work was not adequately project managed,...