LCRO 176/2021 BR v UE and VJ (7 December 2022) [pdf, 223 KB]
...[42] This case presents something of a conundrum. Mr Ragg’s correspondence was before the Courts. Neither Osborne J (in the High Court) or the members of the Court of Appeal, commented on the content of Mr Ragg’s emails. Consequently, those judgments do not assist greatly in reaching a view in this instance. However, the fact that neither Court made any comment would suggest that none of the Judges found the correspondence to be objectionable. 11 [43] Balanced against...