Search Results

1. [2017] NZEnvC 168 Mawhinney v Auckland Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...[3](b) . ~. P W Mawhinney affidavit 19 June 201 5 at [1 7.16] [Environment Court (201 5) document 2). ~~ \ J \ I I"' :s .)'l . ' . , , ~? / %, ,:/~ ki,! .f)i r /;,/ .~~~ 7 respect to the latter, Blanchard J, giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Bayley v Manukau City Council18 wrote: ... Applications can be made under s 88(3) for a consent "under a plan or proposed plan". Naturally, where two such district plans co-exist a consent under...

2. 2021-04-23 TAs - MOC - submissions [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...Zealand Ltd v Fletcher Challenge Energy Ltd [2002] 2 NZLR 433. 22 Police v Bannin [1991] 2 NZLR 237. 12 RAC-098608-70-36-V1 provides a clear indication of the TA’s intention for abstracting the water, that does not require subjective judgement. ‘For Human Consumption…’ 48. ‘Human consumption’ is defined inclusively with “food preparation, utensil washing, and oral or other personal hygiene”. This indicates that the meaning of ‘human consumption’ is...

3. 2021-04-23 TAs - MOC - submissions 2 [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...Zealand Ltd v Fletcher Challenge Energy Ltd [2002] 2 NZLR 433. 22 Police v Bannin [1991] 2 NZLR 237. 12 RAC-098608-70-36-V1 provides a clear indication of the TA’s intention for abstracting the water, that does not require subjective judgement. ‘For Human Consumption…’ 48. ‘Human consumption’ is defined inclusively with “food preparation, utensil washing, and oral or other personal hygiene”. This indicates that the meaning of ‘human consumption’ is...

4. 2015 Ministry of Justice annual report - our financial performance [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS In preparing these financial statements the Ministry has made estimates and assumptions about the future. These estimates and assumptions may differ from the subsequent actual results. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstances. The estimates and assumptions that have a risk of ca...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 23 Pilgrim v The Attorney-General [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...defendant S Valor, S Standfast and P Righteous, representatives for second defendants R Kirkness, counsel to assist the Court D Nilsson, counsel for TVNZ R K Stewart, counsel for RNZ A Leask for NZME J Naish for Stuff C Callahan for Newshub Judgment: 22 February 2023 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 27) OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS (Applications by TVNZ/NZME/Stuff/Newshub to attend Gloriavale site visit) [1] The Court is undertaking a site visit of the Glori...

6. Hammond v Credit Union Baywide [2015] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...February 2012. At that meeting the parties came to a settlement and Ms Gooding resigned. The evidence of Ms Hammond – the cake and the private party [25] When Ms Gooding was served with the letter dated 22 February 2012 challenging her professional judgment she turned to Ms Hammond for support. It was a hard time for her as she was the sole breadwinner for her family of five and the likelihood of finding another job at the same level in Hawke’s Bay, especially in a timely fashion,...

7. Submissions on behalf of Guardians of the Bays Incorporated (dated 13 April 2018) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...under what is now Rule 15.2 of the High Court rules also provide some general guidance as to principle. Under Rule 15.2 the Court may dismiss or stay a proceeding if a plaintiff has failed to prosecute all or part of its proceeding to trial and judgment. The High Court in Lovie v Medical Assurance Society of New Zealand Ltd [1992] NZLR 244, summarised the approach to the issues at 248: Turning to the principles applicable to the substantive issue, the applicant must show that the...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 108 Dromgool v Minister for Land Information [pdf, 4.7 MB]

   jBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER AND BElWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 108 of the Public Works Act 1981 (the Act) of an appeal under ss 23 and 24 of the Act S & D DROMGOOl (ENV-2017-AKl101) AD & J POULTON (ENV-2017-AKl102) NEWMAN FARMS LIMITED (ENV-2017-AKl-103) Objectors MINISTER FOR lAND INFORMATION Respondent Court: Judge JA Smith Commissioner ACE leijnen Commissioner 1M Buchanan Hearin

9. Dermot Nottingham, Philip Nottingham, Robert McKinney & Property Bank Realtor Limited v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 10057) & Martin Honey [2017] NZREADT 69 [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...re-hearing of the appellants’ appeal against a decision of Complaints Assessment Committee 10057 (“the appeal to the Tribunal”) is scheduled to begin on 4 December 2017. Four days have been allocated. The re-hearing was directed in the judgment of the High Court 0n 21 August 20151 (subsequently confirmed in a judgment of the Court of Appeal)2. [2] On 18 August 2017, the Tribunal made directions (by consent) in relation to the re-hearing of the appeal to the Tribunal, includi...

10. Bacic v Tulip Holdings Limited (in liq) [pdf, 110 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000046 BETWEEN BORIS and GIORDANA BACIC Claimants AND TULIP HOLDINGS LIMITED (previously named Buildcorp Holdings Ltd) (In liquidation & removed) First Respondent AND NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND JAMES MICHAEL FAIRGRAY Third Respondent AND RICHARD ARTHUR ZGIERSKI- BOREYKO Fourth Respondent AND MALCOM BROWN MURRAY DAY ARCHITECTS (Removed 5 August 2008) Fifth Respondent AND SEAN LAK