2885 items matching your search terms
BDX v PZY [2023] NZEmpC 169 [4 October 2023] ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME AND IDENTIFYING DETAILS IN THE CONTEXT OF THIS JUDGMENT IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 169 EMPC 155/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings AND IN THE MATTER OF...
...application for stay of execution BETWEEN DA HAI INVESTMENT LIMITED Plaintiff AND ANN SHEILA LEBRETON Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: PJ Marshall, counsel for plaintiff R Johnston, advocate for defendant Judgment: 18 September 2025 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS (Application for stay of execution) Introduction [1] The plaintiff company has applied for a stay of execution of orders made agai...
...BETWEEN GRAHAM HOETE AND AUBREY HOETE Applicants AND LIZA FAULKNER Respondent Hearing: On the papers Counsel: Ms K Feint, Counsel for Graham Hoete and Aubrey Hoete Mr M Sharp, Counsel for Liza Faulkner Judgment: 3 May 2017 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S R CLARK Copies to: Karen Feint, Barrister, Thorndon Chambers, P O Box 1530, Wellington, karen.feint@chambers.co.nz Michael Sharp, Barri...
...[2022] NZACC 245 ACR 177/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN GRAHAM MADOC Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment on the papers. Submissions: P Sara for the Appellant S Arnold for the Respondent Date of Judgment: 9 December 2022 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Late filing of an appeal to the District Court – s 151, Accide...
...subsequent judicial criticism of that lawyer’s conduct during the hearing – such as in an appeal (or similar) – then it is open for the complainant to make a fresh complaint on the basis of that criticism. [138] The High Court’s judicial review judgement is an example of subsequent proceedings in which criticism of a lawyer could be the basis for a fresh complaint. [139] Alternatively, as Review Officer I could treat the judgment as “fresh evidence” and decide whether to...
...(“ML/TF”). In light of these challenges, the analysis within this Study attempts to quantify impacts wherever possible, however, in many cases the analysis relies on adopting a large number of assumptions, applying qualitative feedback and professional judgement. In addition the following caveats apply: A significant representative sample across all impacted industry groups was not possible due to time constraints and low online survey responses; Some entities decline...
...(“ML/TF”). In light of these challenges, the analysis within this Study attempts to quantify impacts wherever possible, however, in many cases the analysis relies on adopting a large number of assumptions, applying qualitative feedback and professional judgement. In addition the following caveats apply: A significant representative sample across all impacted industry groups was not possible due to time constraints and low online survey responses; Some entities decline...
Application Details I(W, ~U.A G: S kti{ Fi rJ & " oS Y LI "'\ T £1) Application Form for a Resource Consent 50 The Octagon. PO Box 5045. Moray Place Dunedin 9058, New Zealand Ph 477 4000 wvvw.dunedin.govt.nz (must be the FULL name(s) of an individual or an enlity registered with the New Zealand Com~nie$ Office. Family Trust names and unofficial trading names are nol acceptable: in those situations, U~ the trustee{a) and director(s) names instead) hereby apply
...BROADSPECTRUM (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED (FORMERLY TRANSFIELD SERVICES (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 6 June 2017 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: T Cleary, counsel for plaintiff R Upton, counsel for defendant Judgment: 6 June 2017 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE K G SMITH [1] Jason Nathan is a registered lines mechanic employed by Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Limited (Broadspectrum). [2] Mr Nathan was dismissed by Broadspectrum in August 201...
...TONY SCHICKER Defendant Hearing: 15 April 2019 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: S Langton, counsel, and L Briffett, advocate for plaintiff No appearance for defendant (the defendant abiding the decision of the Court) Judgment: 18 November 2019 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS [1] This judgment deals with a non-de novo challenge to the Court against determinations of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority), first, refusing to reo...