Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 147 Alim v LSG Sky Chefs Ltd [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...BETWEEN NISHA ALIM Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 30 August 2012 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Tony Drake and Rosemary Childs, counsel for plaintiff Jo Douglas, counsel for defendant Judgment: 31 August 2012 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] On 30 August 2012 the plaintiff filed and served an application for special leave to remove a matter to the Employment Court from the Employment Relations Authority (the Autho...

2. Murray - Ohawini B1 (2020) 217 Taitokerau MB 99 (217 TTK 99) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Ohawini B1 GEORGINA MURRAY Kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 14 August 2020, 215 Taitokerau MB 241-243 (Heard at Whangarei Chambers) Whakataunga: Judgment date 17 September 2020 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ T M WARA Judgment of Judge T M Wara 217 Taitokerau MB 100 He kōrero tīmatanga - Introduction...

3. [2022] NZEmpC 25 UBP Ltd v Rantiaawa-Kaui [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN UBP LIMITED Plaintiff AND HARLEY RANGITAAWA-KAUI Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: J Douglas, counsel for plaintiff A Kersjes, advocate for defendant Judgment: 16 February 2022 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE KATHRYN BECK (Application for stay of execution) [1] These proceedings involve a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority which held th...

4. [2021] NZEnvC 140 Protect Aotea v Auckland Council [pdf, 545 KB]

   ...nature of the effects of the elements of the proposal and the extent to which the various effects of those elements which require resource consent overlap. In Southpark Corporation Ltd v Auckland City Council24 Southpark proposed to erect a power line partly over road where it was a discretionary activity and partly over private land where it was a permitted activity. It applied for a resource consent for the line over roads and requested certificates of compliance for the line o...

5. CARROLL v Coroners Court at Auckland (2013 NZHC 906) [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...Applicants AND THE CORONER'S COURT AT AUCKLAND First Respondent AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE Second Respondent Hearing: 19 March 2013 Counsel: G N Gallaway for the applicants G Coumbe as amicus S W McKenzie for the Police Judgment: 29 April 2013 JUDGMENT OF WINKELMANN J This judgment was delivered by me on 29 April 2013 at 3.00 pm pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules. Registrar/ Deputy Registrar Chapman Tripp, Auckland Crown...

6. 230501-GE23-MOJ-and-EC-roles-and-responsibilities.pdf [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...also consider whether the briefings and/or information may need to be disseminated to all political parties to maintain election impartiality. 32. On any other unforeseen and significant matters, the Secretary for Justice will exercise his judgement in reporting to you. 7 Proactive Release 33. In keeping with openness and transparency, the Ministry intends to proactively release this briefing alongside the protocols on our website, following your noting of the paper...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 20 White & Others v Reserve Bank of New Zealand [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...BANK OF NEW ZEALAND Defendant Hearing: 23, 24, 25 and 26 August 2011 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: Geoff O'Sullivan and Nikkii Flint, counsel for the plaintiffs Peter Chemis and Andrea Pazin, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 17 February 2012 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD Introduction [1] In a determination 1 dated 1 June 2010, the Employment Relations Authority ordered the removal of this proceeding to the Court for hearing at first instance w...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 161 Aslam v Transportation Auckland Corp Ltd [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...BETWEEN MOHAMMAD ASLAM Plaintiff AND TRANSPORTATION AUCKLAND CORPORATION LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 18-19 October 2017 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: M Aslam, plaintiff S Worthy, counsel for defendant Judgment: 14 December 2017 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN Introduction and outcome [1] The plaintiff, Mr Aslam, had been employed as a bus driver for the defendant, Transportation Auckland Corporation Ltd (Transportat...

9. [2023] NZEnvC 277 Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whātua v Auckland Council [pdf, 9.2 MB]

   ...their consideration of the adverse effects under this section must not include offset or compensation. The majority determined that the application is contrary to some objectives and/or policies. At paragraph [670] they speak of a broad overall judgement being appropriate. They recognised that the proposal was contrary to some policies, but stated that these were not so central as to sway the decision. Unfortunately, the majority did not identify which provisions they consider...

10. [2010] NZEmpC 84 Secretary for Justice v Dodd [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE Plaintiff AND CATHERINE ANNE DODD Defendant Hearing: 10-12 March 2010 (Heard at New Plymouth) Appearances: Alastair Sherriff and Deirdre Marshall, Counsel for Plaintiff Susan Hughes QC, Counsel for Defendant Judgment: 2 July 2010 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] This is a challenge by hearing de novo to the determination1 of the Employment Relations Authority that Catherine Dodd was dismissed unjustifiably and reinstating her as m...