Search Results

Search results for judgments on line.

2844 items matching your search terms

  1. [2022] NZEmpC 175 Invacare New Zealand Ltd v Pyne [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...DARREN PYNE Plaintiff AND INVACARE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 12 September 2022 (heard by telephone) Appearances: P Pa’u, advocate for Darren Pyne E Butcher and C Joy, counsel for Invacare NZ Limited Judgment: 22 September 2022 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS (Application for leave to extend time to file a challenge) (Application for a stay of execution) Introduction [1] Mr Pyne was employed by Invacare N...

  2. [2021] NZACC 20 - Jamieson v ACC (28 January 2021) [pdf, 160 KB]

    ...ACR 90/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER S 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN AYLTON JAMIESON Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the Papers Judgment: 28 January 2021 ____________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT OF JUDGE AA SINCLAIR [As to Costs] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] In my judgment dated 1...

  3. 2023-NZEnvC-244-The-Canyon-Vineyard-Limited-v-Central-Otago-District-Council.pdf [pdf, 2.8 MB]

    ...identify a second mound on Lot 8. The High Court and Court of Appeal have determined that this is an error amenable to correction by the Environment Court, being empowered by the District Court Rules 2014 to correct an accidental slip or omission in a judgment or order.3 [3] The High Court directed that the parties confer and liaise with the Environment Court to replace the approved plans with a plan that correctly identifies a secondary mound, the purpose of which is to screen the acce...

  4. [2010] NZEmpC 140 Weston v Advkit Para Legal Services Ltd [pdf, 49 KB]

    ...from the plaintiff on 12 May 2010 Submissions received from the defendant on 19 May 2010 Submissions received from the plaintiff in reply on 21 May 2010 Appearances: John Gwilliam, counsel for plaintiff Graeme Ogilvie, advocate for defendant Judgment: 26 October 2010 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] The plaintiff, Mrs Weston, has challenged a determination of the Employment Relations Authority which found that her resignation from her employment with the defendant w...

  5. KB v JR LCRO 191/2012 (14 May 2014) [pdf, 192 KB]

    ...should not have signed the Deed. e) Whether Ms JR expected [Ms KB] not to declare to WINZ, money that Ms JR held in her trust account on behalf of Mr CG, as part of Mr CG's Residential Care Subsidy application. f) Whether Ms JR passed judgment on [MsKB] as EPOA. g) Whether Ms JR's refusal to transfer Mrs CG's 1/2 share in [Property] to Mr CG breaches professional standards. h) Whether Ms JR has a conflict of interest because [Brother CG] is a client of...

  6. Bayne v Ngati Rehua Ngati Wai ki Aotea Trust Board - Ngatirehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea Trust (2015) 115 Taitokerau MB 41 (115 TTK 41) [pdf, 228 KB]

    ...(Heard at Whangarei) Counsel: Mr Paul Chambers for the applicant Mr Spencer Webster for Ngati Rehua and Ngati Wai ki Aotea Trust Mr Wayne Peters for the Ngati Wai Trust Board Mr Craig Linkhorn and Ms Ellen Chapple for the Crown Judgment: 5 November 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M P ARMSTRONG Copies to: Paul Chambers Barrister PO Box 41351 Auckland 1346 paul.chambers@vodafone.co.nz Spencer Webster, Koning Webster Lawyers, 34 Gravat...

  7. Pacey v Adlam - Matata Parish 39A2B2B2A and Matata 30A 2A (2016) 147 Waiariki MB 143 (147 WAR 143) [pdf, 260 KB]

    ...Hearing: 18 August 2016 (Heard at Rotorua) Appearances: D Wackrow for the First Applicant D Dowthwaite for the Second Applicant L Van for the First Respondent T Wara for the Second Respondent M Sharp for the Third Respondent Judgment: 9 September 2016 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD Copies to: D Wackrow, PO Box 461, Auckland 1140 - don@wwandd.co.nz D Dowthwaite, DX JP30009, Rotorua 3046 - lawyers@xtra.co.nz L Van, PO Box 2646 Aucklan...

  8. 2016 Ministry of Justice Annual Report [pdf, 2.8 MB]

    ...and reparations Effective collection of fines and reparations is important in ensuring the credibility of fines as a sentencing option. We follow up on the non-payment of court-imposed fines and reparations, and enforce civil debts on behalf of judgement creditors where the courts have ordered payment. In the past 2 years, the amount of debt owing from fines and reparations has slowly risen and the amount of debt collected has fallen. At 30 June 2016, total debt owing was $593 mi...

  9. Consent Order - Walden, Straits Protection Society & Smart v Auckland Council [pdf, 1021 KB]

    ...Inc (CIV-2016-404-002349). The Straits Protection Society Incorporated appeal (the Straits appeal) and the G & C Smart appeal (the Smart appeal) were lodged in July 2017 pursuant to s 156(3) ofthe LGATPA after the High Court had issued its judgment in the related judicial review proceedings: The Straits Protection Society Incorporated v Auckland Council. 1 [3] The appeals challenged the Council's decision to accept the recommendation made by the Auckland Unitary Plan Inde...