2844 items matching your search terms
...IA L IN FO RM AT IO N AC T 19 82response "Part of this document was not provided because it does not form part of your request." If the remainder of the document does not fall within the request but is not sensitive, there is a judgment call to be made. Once the redactions are marked up, in one combined file, save it as a new version (put "marked up" at the end of the file name). DO NOT APPLY THE REDACTIONS YET. If you want to create a "clean&quo...
...INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND SECRETARY FOR EDUCATION Defendant Hearing: 7 August 2025 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: P Cranney and K Gawe, counsel for plaintiff S Hornsby-Geluk, counsel for defendant Judgment: 13 August 2025 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE HELEN DOYLE (Application for interim injunction) [1] NZEI Te Riu Roa Incorporated (NZEI), a registered union, seeks an interim injunction restraining the Secretar...
...RAUHUIA HILTON, OWEN JERRY HAPUKU, RUIHA TIAKINA ERUETI WOODWARD, THOMAS KEREMENETA-HUPATA Respondents Hearing: 5 August 2011 (Heard at Hastings) Appearances: Ms C Bennet for the Applicants Mr J Johnston for the Respondents Judgment: 11 August 2011 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE LR HARVEY Solicitors: cara@langleytwigg.co.nz – Langley Twigg Lawyers, PO Box 446, Napier 4140 qjohnston@batehallett.co.nz - Bate Hallet Lawyers, PO Box...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2015-100-000009 [2017] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 BETWEEN SIMON OVAN BROOME, ELIZABETH ANN BAIRD AND MATTHEW LANGLEY CARSON AS TRUSTEES OF THE SO & EA BROOME FAMILY TRUST Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AND EQUUS INDUSTRIES LIMITED Second Respondent (Removed) AND AQUASTOP LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Third Respondent AND BOSTIK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Fourth Respondent (Removed) Site inspection 5 October
...remote to form proper part of his investigation. That question, potentially a very difficult question, is for him. If these inquests were to be resumed and I emphasis if, the question would have to be answered by the new coroner, exercising his judgment as best he can and all the information available in the knowledge that, wherever he drew the line, his ruling would be unwelcome to some. It is, however, clear, as was accepted by counsel for the applicants in argument, that the tr...
...simple interest at a prescribed maximum rate on the whole or part of any amount determined to be paid to the claimant(s) for the whole or any part of the period between when the cause of action arose and the date of payment in accordance with the judgment. [58] The effect of the two claims made in the present case is to claim twice for the same loss, or at least for there to be an overlap in part because the $70,000.00 the owners borrowed from Westpac in or about May CLAIM NO...
...AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN ABC Plaintiff AND DEF Defendant Hearing: (on the papers) Appearances: ABC, in person S Hornsby-Geluk and B Locke, counsel for defendant Judgment: 24 May 2022 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] This judgment resolves a costs application following a substantive judgment of 25 November 2021 in which I concluded that a direction to mediate had be...
...A20110005454 UNDER Section 18(1)a), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Raupo BETWEEN ROSELINE ANDERSON Applicant Hearing: 12 December 2011 24 May 2012 26 August 2013 (Heard at Whangarei) Judgment: 31 March 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER 99 Taitokerau MB 207 Introduction [1] In late 1997 Wilson Gardner assumed the rights and obligations under an exist...
...Respondent Hearing: 4 November 2024, subsequent evidence 19 February 2025 and supplementary submissions 25 February 2025 Heard at: Wellington/ Te Whanganui-A-Tara Appearances: M Remiens for the Appellant P A McBride for the Respondent Judgment: 26 March 2025 ___________________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF AA SINCLAIR [Cover: ss 25 and 26. Accident Compensation Act 2001] ___________________________________________...
...sound methodology and both impressed as reliable independent experts, including in their readiness to make appropriate concessions in cross-examination and court questioning. While we ultimately make our determinations as a matter of evaluative judgment, both experts significantly assisted us in those terms. 16 Methodology [34] According to the sequence of evidence exchange, the primary landscape evaluation was offered by Mr Stephen Brown. Ivis Mellsop largely critiqued that...