Search Results

1. [2007] NZEmpC AC 52/07 General Distributors Ltd v National Distribution Union [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...BETWEEN GENERAL DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED Plaintiff AND NATIONAL DISTRIBUTION UNION Defendant Hearing: 31 August 2007 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Stephen Langton, counsel for the plaintiff Peter Cranney, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 7 September 2007 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] This is a dispute between the parties as to whether employees at the plaintiff’s Woolworths Manurewa Supermarket are entitled to redundancy compensation or relocation a...

2. AN v DH LCRO 119/2015 (23 December 2015) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...about Boxing Day contact was fabricated, then that would be an end of the matter. 2 DH v Kimber [2014] NZFC 1092 at [6]. 5 [20] The Family Court hearing recommenced on 7 April 2014, and the judgment followed on 30 April 2014. The Family Court judgment was critical of Ms DH and MM’s father,3 but concluded TH was “essentially a truthful witness”.4 [21] The Family Court judgment also referred to Ms AN’s conduct of the matter...

3. Matchitt - Te Kaha 65 (2014) 104 Waiariki MB 145 (104 WAR 145) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...comprising 3.252 hectares. The majority of the owners are siblings. The Court has previously dealt with other applications for partition completed in 2010 and 2012 respectively. 1 The history between the siblings was explained in the last of those judgments dated 6 November 2012 dismissing an application filed by Mr Edward Matchitt. 2 The Court has before it another two applications from this whānau, one for partition and the other for the amendment of four occupation orders....

4. [2016] NZEmpC 70 S v I Ltd Interlocutory No three [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...I LIMITED (FORMERLY L LIMITED) Defendant Hearing: By documents filed on 17 March, 18 April, 9 May and 24 May, and 7 June 2016 Appearances: Anthony Shaw, counsel for plaintiff Richard Harrison, counsel for defendant Judgment: 10 June 2016 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 3) OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] The defendant seeks an order for security for costs, failing which it says that the plaintiff’s proceedings should be stayed. [2] The Court is em...

5. MVDT Annual Report 2020-2021 [pdf, 360 KB]

   ...itself). Those applicants are required to file a new claim to seek that remedy because the Tribunal’s work orders are not enforceable by the applicant if the trader fails to comply. The Tribunal’s decisions are enforceable as if they are a final judgment of the District Court in its civil jurisdiction.1 The types of enforcement proceeding that can be pursued in the District Court are found in s 131 of the District Court Act 2016, which states that the following enforcement procee...

6. BN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2025] NZACC 67 (29 April 2025) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN BN Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: J Copland for the Applicant F Becroft and L Hawes-Gandar for the Corporation Judgment: 29 April 2025 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Leave to Appeal to High Court: s 162 Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of Her Honour, Judge Henare, del...

7. CW v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for cover for mental injury) [2025] NZACC 067 (7 April 2025) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN BN Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: J Copland for the Applicant F Becroft and L Hawes-Gandar for the Corporation Judgment: 29 April 2025 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Leave to Appeal to High Court: s 162 Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of Her Honour, Judge Henare, del...

8. ENVC Hearing 27Jul15 AC suppl evidence Nicole Bremner [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...the northern beach and reserve out to the mouth of the Bay. Mr Brown also acknowledges some of the other 'gains' that have been made with the resizing and reshaping of other marina elements. 26. In terms of arriving at an overall judgment, I remain of the view that the more than minor visual and amenity effects arising from the parking aspect of the proposal will be concentrated on a relatively small part of the northern Bay, while the effects experienced across the w...

9. Otago Standards Committee v Zhao [2016] NZLCDT 32 [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...the management of his trust account. We accept that the conduct of that practitioner was more serious than the present conduct. 14 and Salter15 11 See note 8 at [24]. . In fact, in each of those judgments the Tribunal did not suspend the practitioner. And, as we have found when comparing the Appleby decision, the conduct of the subject practitioner was less serious or concerning than that in the present instance. In Holmes, the p...

10. Reedy - Waitangi A1A2 (2003) 65 Ruatōria MB 168 (65 RUA 168) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    ...217-230), the proposal above was soundly rejected by the beneficial owners and trustees represented. Instead the Court was advised that the whanau associated with the Trust wanted to retain the current trustees. Despite that the applicant still wanted judgment on his application and I reserved for written decision. (63 Rua MB 228) At the very same instant as the hearing was being conducted by the Court in Gisborne, Mr Pekama Tawera a beneficiary of the trust, filed a new application unde...