2885 items matching your search terms
...A20110005454 UNDER Section 18(1)a), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Raupo BETWEEN ROSELINE ANDERSON Applicant Hearing: 12 December 2011 24 May 2012 26 August 2013 (Heard at Whangarei) Judgment: 31 March 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER 99 Taitokerau MB 207 Introduction [1] In late 1997 Wilson Gardner assumed the rights and obligations under an exist...
...Respondent Hearing: 4 November 2024, subsequent evidence 19 February 2025 and supplementary submissions 25 February 2025 Heard at: Wellington/ Te Whanganui-A-Tara Appearances: M Remiens for the Appellant P A McBride for the Respondent Judgment: 26 March 2025 ___________________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF AA SINCLAIR [Cover: ss 25 and 26. Accident Compensation Act 2001] ___________________________________________...
...sound methodology and both impressed as reliable independent experts, including in their readiness to make appropriate concessions in cross-examination and court questioning. While we ultimately make our determinations as a matter of evaluative judgment, both experts significantly assisted us in those terms. 16 Methodology [34] According to the sequence of evidence exchange, the primary landscape evaluation was offered by Mr Stephen Brown. Ivis Mellsop largely critiqued that...
...AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN ABC Plaintiff AND DEF Defendant Hearing: (on the papers) Appearances: ABC, in person S Hornsby-Geluk and B Locke, counsel for defendant Judgment: 24 May 2022 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] This judgment resolves a costs application following a substantive judgment of 25 November 2021 in which I concluded that a direction to mediate had be...
...the northern beach and reserve out to the mouth of the Bay. Mr Brown also acknowledges some of the other 'gains' that have been made with the resizing and reshaping of other marina elements. 26. In terms of arriving at an overall judgment, I remain of the view that the more than minor visual and amenity effects arising from the parking aspect of the proposal will be concentrated on a relatively small part of the northern Bay, while the effects experienced across the w...
...the management of his trust account. We accept that the conduct of that practitioner was more serious than the present conduct. 14 and Salter15 11 See note 8 at [24]. . In fact, in each of those judgments the Tribunal did not suspend the practitioner. And, as we have found when comparing the Appleby decision, the conduct of the subject practitioner was less serious or concerning than that in the present instance. In Holmes, the p...
...BETWEEN GENERAL DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED Plaintiff AND NATIONAL DISTRIBUTION UNION Defendant Hearing: 31 August 2007 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Stephen Langton, counsel for the plaintiff Peter Cranney, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 7 September 2007 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] This is a dispute between the parties as to whether employees at the plaintiff’s Woolworths Manurewa Supermarket are entitled to redundancy compensation or relocation a...
...about Boxing Day contact was fabricated, then that would be an end of the matter. 2 DH v Kimber [2014] NZFC 1092 at [6]. 5 [20] The Family Court hearing recommenced on 7 April 2014, and the judgment followed on 30 April 2014. The Family Court judgment was critical of Ms DH and MM’s father,3 but concluded TH was “essentially a truthful witness”.4 [21] The Family Court judgment also referred to Ms AN’s conduct of the matter...
...comprising 3.252 hectares. The majority of the owners are siblings. The Court has previously dealt with other applications for partition completed in 2010 and 2012 respectively. 1 The history between the siblings was explained in the last of those judgments dated 6 November 2012 dismissing an application filed by Mr Edward Matchitt. 2 The Court has before it another two applications from this whānau, one for partition and the other for the amendment of four occupation orders....
...I LIMITED (FORMERLY L LIMITED) Defendant Hearing: By documents filed on 17 March, 18 April, 9 May and 24 May, and 7 June 2016 Appearances: Anthony Shaw, counsel for plaintiff Richard Harrison, counsel for defendant Judgment: 10 June 2016 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 3) OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] The defendant seeks an order for security for costs, failing which it says that the plaintiff’s proceedings should be stayed. [2] The Court is em...