HF v SZ LCRO 186 / 2009 (16 January 2012) - Publication Decision [pdf, 62 KB]
...Practitioner which covered a number of grounds that are relevant to the making of a publication order. I have considered these, and also the submissions of the Complainant’s family. [5] The Practitioner accepted that there had been a want of judgment on his part in this case but disagreed that he posed a risk to the public. He stated that he had not discerned that the client was suffering under a mental disability at the time of their meeting, and that she appeared able to im...