2885 items matching your search terms
...a new proceeding File a document in proceedings Name of case Document type Comply with a direction for setting down fees or determination of a hearing date Comply with a direction for hearing fees Obtain a copy of a judgment Search court records Other Court use only / Refer to proceedings file no. Step 2 Give us your details Who are you filling in this form for? I am authorised to complete t...
...Ltd’s recommendation was a poor one. D Ltd says what UI and II were asking for was unlikely to have solved the problem (even though it appears to have in the end) and ‘reasonable care and skill’ only requires that suppliers apply reasonable judgement, which in the case of diagnostic services, requires that they go with the probabilities, applying the most likely fixes first. 11. No independent evidence, in the form of other expert opinion for example, was provided by UI and II t...
...BETWEEN SOUTH PACIFIC MEATS LIMITED Plaintiff AND SAHIZAD MOHAMMED Defendant Hearing: 26 and 27 March 2012 (Heard at Invercargill) Counsel: Graeme Malone, counsel for plaintiff Peter Churchman, counsel for defendant Judgment: 21 June 2012 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS Background [1] Mr Sahizad Mohammed was employed by South Pacific Meats Limited at its Invercargill plant in February 2006. He worked as an A-grade halal slaughterman on the d...
...being exposed to serious harm 8 Section 17 of the Adoption Act recognises adoptions in overseas courts regardless of the adoptive parents’ suitability or the child’s best interests. In effect, New Zealand’s outdated adoption law defers to the judgements of overseas courts regardless of whether there are adequate checks in place to protect children. In practice, people with criminal convictions and histories of abusing and exploiting children have been able to adopt children oversea...
...NZLR 438; [1991] NZAR 385 Tipping J considered this question at p 390 stated: The essence of an accrued right in this context is that something must have happened to give the person claiming the right the ability to prosecute the same to judgement. Although the right need not have matured into formal legal relief the facts entitling the person concerned to relief must have happened before the repeal in such a form that the right, although not having matured into judgement or r...
...in out[sic] Multi- Disciplinary Meeting.” 25. BOPDHB’s policy11 at the time stated that if a consumer misses two appointments and has a current risk assessment that indicates unknown/low risk, a decision should be made based on clinical judgement and/or the referrer's level of concern whether a third appointment should be attempted or whether a letter should be sent advising the consumer of discharge from the service if they do not contact the service within 14 days....
...BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND AIR LINE PILOTS' ASSOCIATION INC Plaintiff AND AIR NELSON LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 30 August 2010 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Richard McCabe, counsel for plaintiff David France, counsel for defendant Judgment: 30 September 2010 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] The plaintiff (NZALPA) has challenged a determination of the Employment Relations Authority which rejected its claim that the defendant (Air Nelson) had breached the...
...Hearing: 12 August 2009 (Heard at Tauranga) Court: Judge L R Harvey (Presiding) Judge D J Ambler Judge C T Coxhead Appearances: Mr P Rupe, Lay advocate appearing for Appellant Ms R Zame, for the Western Bay of Plenty District Council Judgment: 21 December 2010 at 4:45 PM JUDGMENT OF THE APPELLATE COURT Reasons of Judge CT Coxhead 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 673 TABLE OF CONTENTS He Mihi ki a Toa Faulkner [1] Introduction [2...
...made for Mr AA to have access to a land line at the Disputes Tribunal in Christchurch for this purpose. [18] In the days prior to the hearing Mr AA made requests for this Office to obtain transcripts of the High Court proceedings for him. The judgments of Panckhurst J are all that is required for the purposes of this review and the general principle followed by this Office is that no new evidence would be accepted on review. This Office does not follow directions from applican...
...AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 29 November 2024 Held at: Wellington by AVL Appearances: S Winter for the Appellant P McBride for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 6 December 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claims process - s 134(1), Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 28 February 2023. The...